Quote:
|
Originally Posted by deathcurse
The way magic is used in this world has always felt a little "master/slave" to me...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Laith
That's basically it actually. At least in gameplay. The Gammel Lecture on Fairies basically say that you must convince them to work for you and the like.
|
Actually, that's expressed a little bit in gameplay, because of how fairies (and certain other units--Phantoms and Demons, I've found, are notorious for it), will tend to start wandering off on their own and doing what they like if not given regular orders. Different familiars really do seem to have a varying amount of "free will," whether it's because of a rebellious nature (Demons, for example, I suspect will always try to have their cake and eat it too) or something else.
For what it's worth, Glamour magic seems to rely upon a "contract" for service--in essence, they're more like hired workers than slave labor. On the other hand, Sorcery is pretty clearly "force these devils to do your bidding" (unless the devil is of sufficient power to resist the binding aspects of the spell and require a quid pro quo...souls always being a handy currency), and Necromancy seems to work in similar fashion (Advocat's comments about Opalneria's "pale friends" aside)--of course, it's an open question as to what the dead souls of Purgatory actually feel about being summoned to serve a magician's whim or how much free will they have. Phantoms, for example, seem to see themselves as loyal knights serving their liege-lord to judge by their in-battle dialogue.
Alchemy opens up a whole different can of worms, because the process actually
creates the life forms which are then forced to act! That might be one matter for unintelligent blobs and chimeras, but what about quite intelligent homunculi? And does it affect this ethical debate that alchemical creations are apparently soulless?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by antlan87
Well, I'm pretty sure Dr. Chartreuse didn't ask the angel whose soul inhabits Amoretta for permission, as if he could contact angels, he wouldn't have needed to make her in the first place.
|
Two points there, though: on the one hand, if he didn't know any magic that could talk to angels, then how did he know magic to be able to capture and imprison one? If he could do the latter, then it would be implied that he could do the former. On the other hand, it's entirely possible that angels
wouldn't or
couldn't answer the questions that he asked (in the sense that Divine Law prevented it, perhaps?) and that by putting the angel spirit into a mortal body, he hoped that, as the angel was now a mortal being, that it could now speak freely on topics that it could not beforehand (but was thwarted by the memory loss)? Of course, the latter point does not speak to the willingness or lack thereof of the angel in question.
What I think is somewhat intriguing, also, is just
how Dr. Chartreuse contacted the angel in the first place! Since the
Lemegeton, the Lesser Key of Solomon, explicitly exists in this universe (and actually
as Solomon's grimoire instead of a 17th-century construct), one thing I think is interesting is that
the third book of the Lemegeton, called the Ars Paulina, as well as the fourth part, Ars Almadel, are about dealing with angels!
I note from the Wikipedia article that astrological influences are deemed important in the
Lemegeton for determining what times are good for various summonings--something that ties in to that orrery sitting in Professor Gammel's room!