Mark Forums Read
Saints of Priscilla
Priscilla's "Trial": Angel or Demon?
Trouble logging in?
We were forced to invalidate all account passwords. You will have to
reset your password
to login. If you have trouble resetting your password, please
send us a message
with as much helpful information as possible, such as your username and any email addresses you may have used to register. Whatever you do, please
create a new account. That is not the right solution, and it is against our forum rules to own multiple accounts.
Priscilla's "Trial": Angel or Demon?
Revan....you're giving me a migrane....
And goddamn my inability to post pictures
(I've been wanting to post Phoenix Wright picture for awhile now
Your Honor, may I direct your attention to the very first two pages of the issue. They are a bit difficult not to notice. I then point your attention to the question of "Why"; these pages and the remainders contradict themselves, and together, contradict the prosecution's assault.
Their is more here then meets the eye; I believe this is not the open-and-shut case the prosecution have dreamt themselves to believe. For that matter, I hereby request this trial be suspended until further notice until we can conclusively understand how and why these developments unfolded as they do and what will happen next. It would be result in a premature verdict to ignore what is in front of our faces.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I have received a disturbing message that I believe highlights the anti-justice and lack of caring about the common people of this land. Quote,
"Roflmao, Revan, what on earth are you talking about?
I say the prosecution is forgetting the conclusive evidence"
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I want you to witness the true ignorance of that statement by the defense team. The defense would have us believe that because they "know" their client personally, somehow she is more worthy of respect and defense than more than 1100 murder victims. Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, can you find anything more evil than condemning innocents to die because the defense is not willing to condemn a murderer? Their client has just committed another great sacrilege upon our lands, and their response is that she's somehow redeemed and we should get over the death of those innocents.
I have with me today a young girl who was rescued from the ashes of Ticheri by a traveling member of our priesthood and brought to Rabona. I would request the utmost respect for her, as she has recently lost her entire family.
(Little girl takes the stand sobbing)
"Young lady, what is your name?"
(sobbing) "My...(sob)..my name...(sniff)...my name is Riccarda."
Young lady, I know this is very hard on you, but could you tell the members of the jury what you saw today as you entered Ticheri?
Riccarda: (sniff) "There was this lady with red-brown hair...(sniff)...and she was...she (sobs)...she ate them all! She...kept repeating..."
What did she repeat?
"She kept saying how hungry she was, and then when...when mommy and daddy begged her to spare them...(uncontrollably sobbing)"
Your Honor, no further questions, the child is clearly been horribly traumatized.
(Riccarda leaves the stand)
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I put it to you today a question. What is this path of redemption the defense team speaks of? Is it really redemption, or is it death? How many more little Riccardas must the world see before we realize that there is no redemption for the defendant? How many dead grandparents later will it be before we put a stop to this and sentence the defendant to what she truly deserves?
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I tell you today, this path of redemption the defense speaks of is nothing but the descent into hell. They keep telling you it isn't, but sooner or later the hellfire shall scorch you as it did little Riccarda, and by then it will be too late for justice. It will be too late for good in this world. Ladies and Gentlemen, if you do not act, it will be too late for humanity!
That reminds me of Ricky Ricardo, or the name of an Italian sportscar Revan!!
I love how it went from all of them dying, to a specific number, and now their's a cliched poor little girl survivor...You ever notice how the survivor isn't a buff bald-headed guy or something?
But shiek, it has been proved that Priscilla doesn't eat little girls. So, it's not a surprise that it was a female with not many winters that survived.
Still, Priscilla did something very good this chapter. She vanquished from this world two monsters that had been tormenting it for over a century now.
but technically couldn't you class Riful as a little girl? also the fact that there were no survivors who lived in the village & Priscilla admits eating everyone in the village means she would of eaten small girls there too.
Clare was a fluke.
Clare was not the only case, there is Ophelia too and Riful did say in the Witch's Maw arc that even tough Priscilla ate entire villages, she never touched little girls because it was like they didn't get reflected in her eyes.
So, basically, I think Priscilla can't see little girls by some reason. Or they are just too insignificant and she is not even aware of them.
One way or another, Priscilla doesn't know that she didn't ate little girls. She refused to do it on a subconscient level and, to her, she ate everyone on the village.
And Riful is an Awakened Being, not a little girl.
It's unknown why Priscilla lets go little girls....shoot, it's unknown if that part is even true. Things just don't add up whenever I think about that subject:
Why does she let them go? Why Claire specifically? Does she let them go even if her hunger says otherwise?
I want to hear from her mouth the reasons why, things just don't add up.
Riful however, she probably didn't see because, yes even though she is a little girl and that's contradictory, she can clearly sense her power and she is not human.
even then in the current arc, the org scouts made no mention of any surviving girls, in fact they confirmed outside Raki there were no survivors. We also have Priscilla admitting to eating them all thus obviously she ate little girls.
if i may,
i'm sure that the little girls "being eaten" by priscilla, is merely an oversight by yagi. he's too busy with all that is going on now, to realize this small detail that he messed up on, which we noticed.
i seriously doubt priscilla would suddenly change and start eating little girls, when she hasn't the entire manga (well, okay she devoured 4 towns in the nothern lands, but again i'll say this is another "oversight" by yagi, not adressing the minor detail of her not eating little girls). Clare, Ophelia, and maybe some more which i can't think of at the moment.
as to why priscilla doesn't eat little girls:
(while no one knows for certain, including me too, i do have some reasonable explanations)
1. the little girls remind priscilla of herself, thus she can't kill them, as it would feel like she's killing herself. (much like how priscilla, reminded teresa of clare, and teresa couldn't decapitate priscilla in town, while she had clare "get her stuff", lol).
2. AO/Awakened priscilla is disgusted with herself when she was a weak helpless human child. she now sees such human child girls as such a "low creature", they aren't even worth killing/eating.
3. etc... (too tired to try to think of anything else)
I wonder if she would survive in the end, seems highly unlikely.
Page 3 of 3
Mark This Discussion Read
Mark This Discussion Read
All times are GMT -5. The time now is
-- AnimeSuki Default
-- AnimeSuki Default (Contacts Highlighted)
-- AnimeSuki Default (Original Navigation)
-- AnimeSuki Compressed
-- AnimeSuki Blue
-- AnimeSuki Blue (Reordered)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.