AnimeSuki.com Forum

AnimeSuki Forum (http://forums.animesuki.com/index.php)
-   General Anime (http://forums.animesuki.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Anime or not? (http://forums.animesuki.com/showthread.php?t=107755)

domoarigato1995 2011-10-21 16:09

Anime or not?
 
Is it technically anime if, for example, Gonzo or Production I.G and a Canadian animation studio did the main animation production on a movie and worked with investors in Japan?

Kyuu 2011-10-21 16:44

Well... the old "what is anime" question. I've been an advocate on disregarding the "geographical consideration" towards determine if a product is an "anime or not". It is better to focus on the end products themselves to determine that. Even then, there exists a general bottom line that states "who cares". That's on the sheer premise that "animation is animation" regardless and outright.

Finally, this is not a very popular viewpoint, especially among those who retain "anime as something strictly from Japan".

bhl88 2011-10-21 16:53

Yeah... the viewpoint has stuck to me somehow (3 categories for me: anime, animation and cartoons, though they are the same).

Archon_Wing 2011-10-21 17:06

This is a hard one, but it almost comes down to how they want to market it.

Don't the Japanese refer to it all as "animation" anyways?

Puddingman 2011-10-21 17:09

What's the interest in having a solid definition? After all, it's clear you know what it is for yourself. You can identify it and chose to enjoy it if you want, that's what counts. Maybe it's something that can't be put into words? If best understood through words, maybe they'd be books instead :heh:

Archon_Wing 2011-10-21 17:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddingman (Post 3818479)
What's the interest in having a solid definition? After all, it's clear you know what it is for yourself. You can identify it and chose to enjoy it if you want, that's what counts. Maybe it's something that can't be put into words? If best understood through words, maybe they'd be books instead :heh:

Well, it is useful if one wants to use that word when talking with others, otherwise it can get confusing.

But yes, it depends on getting the members of any conversation you hold to agree on a definition. There's certainly no law about it, and personal meanings mean the most, but it's nice to clarify things that can come under dispute.

Puddingman 2011-10-21 17:15

Ah I see. If I was ever in that situation I suppose I'd just suggest an anime for someone to watch. I kinda think too that some definitions are too technical for their own good. What if there is a detailed official definition for anime but one outside the art can understand it?

I took a class once where we had to define the term "music therapy" and we came up with this ballin' 1 paragraph long definition; it covered everything about it, but totally meaningless to the average person haha. But I think that's what you're saying when you say personal meanings mean the most.

Archon_Wing 2011-10-21 17:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddingman (Post 3818482)
Ah I see. If I was ever in that situation I suppose I'd just suggest an anime for someone to watch. I kinda think too that some definitions are too technical for their own good. What if there is a detailed official definition for anime but one outside the art can understand it?

I took a class once where we had to define the term "music therapy" and we came up with this ballin' 1 paragraph long definition; it covered everything about it, but totally meaningless to the average person haha. But I think that's what you're saying when you say personal meanings mean the most.

You bring up a good point. Not everyone is an anime fan, and yea it'd be nice to come up with a definition that someone who isn't into it could understand. Not the easiest of things, and subject to much nitpicking, but hey... ;)

But I guess we should go back to thinking of some generalizations and examples.

Puddingman 2011-10-21 17:27

Oh yea, sorry about that. I'll contribute a little to make up for my derailing the topic ^_^.

What you were saying earlier about how Japanese people refer to it, I found a wikipedia entry that confirms it (hopefully wikipedia is credible):

"Anime is the Japanese abbreviated pronunciation of 'animation'".

Wikipedia also says that its hand drawn or computer generated images, which makes me think of something. I wonder what would differentiate anime from say wood block prints or other ancient eastern art? Perhaps an answer lies in that.

Vexx 2011-10-21 17:42

If it feels like anime, exudes japanese cultural values, and is directed/produced by japanese, sure I'll call it anime. Where the frames are actually made is secondary.

Triple_R 2011-10-21 17:59

Yeah, I pretty much agree with Vexx here.

I recently watched an episode of the new Thundercats show. It was a good watch, and I enjoyed it as much as I would a lot of anime shows out there.

However, it was clearly culturally North American, and that does make a couple significant differences between it and anime, that I think seasoned anime fans will notice.

I don't think that these cultural differences are necessarily insignificant. Something like Clannad would likely never arise out of North America, in my view, and cultural differences is a big part of the reason why. That's why I once called Clannad "an anime's anime". There's certain anime shows that are quintessentially anime, as it's very hard to imagine them arising out of any other medium and/or in a non-Asian cultural context.

Archon_Wing 2011-10-21 18:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexx (Post 3818510)
If it feels like anime, exudes japanese cultural values, and is directed/produced by japanese, sure I'll call it anime. Where the frames are actually made is secondary.

That is so true, considering some of it is outsourced.

Kirito 2011-10-22 00:50

Well if the characters have big beady eyes, awesome hair colors, and a great plot then yeah I'll consider it an anime.

Kyuu 2011-10-22 01:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddingman (Post 3818491)
Oh yea, sorry about that. I'll contribute a little to make up for my derailing the topic ^_^.

What you were saying earlier about how Japanese people refer to it, I found a wikipedia entry that confirms it (hopefully wikipedia is credible):

"Anime is the Japanese abbreviated pronunciation of 'animation'".

Wikipedia also says that its hand drawn or computer generated images, which makes me think of something. I wonder what would differentiate anime from say wood block prints or other ancient eastern art? Perhaps an answer lies in that.

I've dabbed a bit here and there on that article - myself.

:3

After some thought, I've found myself focusing more on the animation styles themselves. With regards to story, that's irrelevant, because you can take any story and plug it into "anime". For example, the Marvel series - despite them not turning out all that great.

When it comes to anime, it is this section that I'd actually want to improve:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime#V...haracteristics
I started it. Many others have come along with their contributions. But it's still lacking something.

In addition, I had once advocated "Avatar: the Last Airbender" as anime. I did that based on watching just a few minutes of it. I had convinced myself of Avatar being anime -- UNTIL -- I actually watched it. This series had scenery that could rival many anime. Some of the action scenes are also just as comparable. But, when it came time for the characters exchanging dialogue... this is where I changed my mind.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexx
If it feels like anime

Per that notion -- Avatar did not feel like anime. Great great story though. It had a more "adult" theme too; to think, there was kissing! Oooooo :p

Oddly enough. This "feeling idea". When I watched the X-Men anime -- I didn't like the idea of that one "feeling Japanese", because the X-Men themselves are Americans. Yet, they behaved like the Japanese, when handling a crisis situation. It was fine adding in a Japanese mutant though.

As for Iron Man, Mr Stark remained a brash, perverted white-boy. :heh::D

ahelo 2011-10-22 10:48

Cartoons made in Japan.

Puddingman 2011-10-27 20:00

I was thinking about this a little bit the other night and I had a question.

If you think of anime from a cultural perspective, then does a video game made in Japan become an Anime-Game?

:heh: I thought it was a cool perspective, thinking of say Final Fantasy as an Anime-Game or something. I think it would have helped tie some connections together for me. I always loved video games but never came to anime until the Summer time. I prob would have been more inclined to check it out if the connections between the two were more obvious.

Vexx 2011-10-27 23:12

A lot of asian sourced MMOs have anime art stylings and storylines. They are aometimes fun to explore simply for that reason.

Triple_R 2011-10-28 01:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puddingman (Post 3828282)
I was thinking about this a little bit the other night and I had a question.

If you think of anime from a cultural perspective, then does a video game made in Japan become an Anime-Game?

:heh: I thought it was a cool perspective, thinking of say Final Fantasy as an Anime-Game or something. I think it would have helped tie some connections together for me. I always loved video games but never came to anime until the Summer time. I prob would have been more inclined to check it out if the connections between the two were more obvious.

JRPGs (especially the most modern ones) often have clear-cut anime influences/inspirations. So, yeah, there's definite similarities between them and anime from a cultural perspective.

bhl88 2011-10-28 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexx (Post 3818510)
If it feels like anime, exudes japanese cultural values, and is directed/produced by japanese, sure I'll call it anime. Where the frames are actually made is secondary.

So if the person is not Japanese (DC), but the one who is making it is JC Studio? (may be NSFW)

Kyuu 2013-02-16 09:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple_R (Post 3828666)
JRPGs (especially the most modern ones) often have clear-cut anime influences/inspirations. So, yeah, there's definite similarities between them and anime from a cultural perspective.

I tend to disregard the cultural aspects, in favor of the more technical ones. Nevertheless, Japanese animation is the only form of animation to have a singular term tied to a specific ethnic group. Many view Japanese animation as "anime", where as everything else is relegated to cartoon or animated series.

Regardless of cultural views, Westerns CAN and should take on careers developing anime on their own. It's all a matter of learning the exact same techniques, when it comes to developing them. Hell, Japanese animators could possibly make some extra money in the states teaching these kinds of courses.

Seeing an add like this today via Facebook is pleasing:

http://i.imgur.com/7zCslvi.png

I'd go into that field myself, except I am too old, not creative enough, and not talented enough to do so. The best I can do is maintain a perspective outside that which is commonly viewed, in the hopes that someone else would take this opportunity.

bhl88 2013-02-16 09:41

Except that overall.... Making one is suffering.

Triple_R 2013-02-16 09:46

I'd be supportive of western-made animation emulating the general style and aesthetics of anime.

The Teen Titans cartoon of several years back was akin to this. So was Avatar the Last Airbender. It would be nice to see more shows in this vein.

bhl88 2013-02-16 10:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyuu (Post 3818996)
I've dabbed a bit here and there on that article - myself.

:3

After some thought, I've found myself focusing more on the animation styles themselves. With regards to story, that's irrelevant, because you can take any story and plug it into "anime". For example, the Marvel series - despite them not turning out all that great.

When it comes to anime, it is this section that I'd actually want to improve:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime#V...haracteristics
I started it. Many others have come along with their contributions. But it's still lacking something.

In addition, I had once advocated "Avatar: the Last Airbender" as anime. I did that based on watching just a few minutes of it. I had convinced myself of Avatar being anime -- UNTIL -- I actually watched it. This series had scenery that could rival many anime. Some of the action scenes are also just as comparable. But, when it came time for the characters exchanging dialogue... this is where I changed my mind.



Per that notion -- Avatar did not feel like anime. Great great story though. It had a more "adult" theme too; to think, there was kissing! Oooooo :p

Oddly enough. This "feeling idea". When I watched the X-Men anime -- I didn't like the idea of that one "feeling Japanese", because the X-Men themselves are Americans. Yet, they behaved like the Japanese, when handling a crisis situation. It was fine adding in a Japanese mutant though..

As for Iron Man, Mr Stark remained a brash, perverted white-boy. :heh::D

Just by looking at it, I knew that it wasn't one. But I do agree that it's the closest. Teen Titans overdid it.

RichardFromMarple 2013-02-16 11:14

I've often wondered how anime the many shows animated in Japan (with a fairly convincing Anime "feel") but written in Europe (mostly Spain & France) should be regarded.

Kudryavka 2013-02-16 11:40

Anime is animation is cartoons is アニメーション is アニメ.

If you really must make distinctions and are throwing a fit then call it "Japanese animation". And be done. In my opinion the word "anime" should not exist in the English language. It'd be like calling Japanese video games "geemu". Screw that.

That said, I consider animation commissioned and started in Japan as Japanese. Don't consider who does the grunt work, like Japanese doing inbetweening animation for American studios or Koreans doing Japanese animation work. If it is not initially made in Japan but has a healthy serving of Japanese animation flavor, then it is done in a Japanese style, but still that country's animation. And same goes for Japanese animation that imitates other country's animations, they have a different style but are still Japanese by definition of who created it.'

Panty and Stocking with Garterbelt is a Japanese animation done in an American style.

Avatar the Last Airbender is an American animation done in a Japanese style.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is an American animation, period. We ignore the fact that Toei (Japan) did much of its animation.

Ghost in the Shell is a Japanese animation, period. We ignore the fact that Dr Movie (South Korea) did much of its animation.

And also, styles are not exclusive to countries. Japanese style came from Japan, but anyone in the world can do it, even Japanese.

Utsuro no Hako 2013-02-16 11:47

In terms of storytelling, I think the closest thing to anime in the US are the Liquid Television series MTV did in the early '90s, notably The Maxx and Aeon Flux -- Madhouse even hired the creator of Aeon Flux to work on Reign the Conqueror.

LeoXiao 2013-02-16 13:38

IMO it's anime if the main demographic is Japanese.

bhl88 2013-02-16 13:44

Does this count?

Kudryavka 2013-02-16 13:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhl88 (Post 4556688)
Does this count?

Was it made by a Japanese company? Then yes.

That Danny Choo is not Japanese has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Triple_R 2013-02-16 13:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kudryavka (Post 4556571)
Anime is animation is cartoons is アニメーション is アニメ.

If you really must make distinctions and are throwing a fit then call it "Japanese animation". And be done. In my opinion the word "anime" should not exist in the English language. It'd be like calling Japanese video games "geemu". Screw that.

The term "anime" basically means "Japanese animation". That's probably how 99% of anime fans use the term "anime".

"Anime" is much easier to write and say than "Japanese animation" is. So what's wrong with using "anime" as a convenient shorthand for "Japanese animation"?

The word "anime" is a very useful word, and it kind of sounds cool, imo.


But I agree that Mirai Millennium is anime. Danny Choo being its Director doesn't detract from that at all - Actually, it arguably adds to it, as Choo is obviously a hardcore anime fan.

Kudryavka 2013-02-16 14:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple_R (Post 4556698)
So what's wrong with using "anime" as a convenient shorthand for "Japanese animation"?

What's wrong is that using such a term for something that already exists in English language (animation) creates an imaginary rift between animation based on what country it's from. Such BS leads to "omg is it true anime?!?!" discussions like this, that often degenerate into sickeningly stupid country superiority contests (thankfully that does not seem to have happened here).

Look at other countries, do we see their animation as so "different", so "unique"? Why don't we have special words for Canadian animation, for French animation, for Korean animation? Why is "anime" so different from everyone else's animation?? It's not, and people should stop pretending it is.

Yes I agree that "anime" is easier to write, and without prior knowledge of the situation of the fan community I would say that characterizing different country's animation with words from their languages is absolutely fine and really cool. But unfortunately I know about the monkey poo throwing that using the term "anime" so much and no words for other countries inevitably causes.

bhl88 2013-02-16 15:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triple_R (Post 4556698)
The term "anime" basically means "Japanese animation". That's probably how 99% of anime fans use the term "anime".

"Anime" is much easier to write and say than "Japanese animation" is. So what's wrong with using "anime" as a convenient shorthand for "Japanese animation"?

The word "anime" is a very useful word, and it kind of sounds cool, imo.


But I agree that Mirai Millennium is anime. Danny Choo being its Director doesn't detract from that at all - Actually, it arguably adds to it, as Choo is obviously a hardcore anime fan.

Nothing's really wrong with it. For Japanese people, the way Americans say: "It's anime, not cartoons" is: WTF they're the same thing.

Kudryavka 2013-02-16 16:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhl88 (Post 4556765)
Nothing's really wrong with it. For Japanese people, the way Americans say: "It's anime, not cartoons" is: WTF they're the same thing.

Yes, the word "anime" just comes directly from the word "animation", which lolol omg is what makes up a cartoon.

Anime is cartoons, they are not different! :eyebrow:

bhl88 2013-02-16 19:26

lol our answers would end up being the same anyway.

Me: Anime =/= cartoons (how to explain to Japan [which doesn't segregate their anime], that both are different? *shows up a blank paper*).
You: Not different.

And you could come look at it.

hyl 2013-02-16 19:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kudryavka (Post 4556751)
What's wrong is that using such a term for something that already exists in English language (animation) creates an imaginary rift between animation based on what country it's from. Such BS leads to "omg is it true anime?!?!" discussions like this, that often degenerate into sickeningly stupid country superiority contests (thankfully that does not seem to have happened here).

Look at other countries, do we see their animation as so "different", so "unique"? Why don't we have special words for Canadian animation, for French animation, for Korean animation? Why is "anime" so different from everyone else's animation?? It's not, and people should stop pretending it is.

For the same exact reason why people make a distinction between Brittish comedy and American comedy, Greek Tragedy and modern tragedy or Hollywood movies and bollywood movies etc.

IMO there is more to it than just differences in animation styles between animes and american cartoons, but it would rather pointless to explain that to you seeing your last few posts.

bhl88 2013-02-16 20:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyl (Post 4556987)
For the same exact reason why people make a distinction between British comedy and American comedy, Greek Tragedy and modern tragedy or Hollywood movies and Bollywood movies etc.

IMO there is more to it than just differences in animation styles between anime and American cartoons, but it would rather pointless to explain that to you seeing your last few posts.

In Japan, people call Superman, Dexter's Lab and whatever else 'anime'.
In here, fans (not all) separate them (and no, fans [again, not all] don't want to lump ponies, coyotes, annoying sisters who blow up labs and superheroes with Nanoha, Haruhi, Robotech, etc. :p ).

Kudryavka 2013-02-16 21:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyl (Post 4556987)
For the same exact reason why people make a distinction between Brittish comedy and American comedy, Greek Tragedy and modern tragedy or Hollywood movies and bollywood movies etc.

IMO there is more to it than just differences in animation styles between animes and american cartoons, but it would rather pointless to explain that to you seeing your last few posts.

You misunderstand, I'm not even talking about stylistic differences or making a distinction. I acknowledged that there are differences, of course, between different styles of animation coming from different countries. Does that warrant a new name for said animation? Seeing how no other country gets the privilege of having its animation being called a special name, apparently not. There is nothing wrong with a new name alone, but the word "anime" has led to people acting like this:
Quote:

Originally Posted by bhl88 (Post 4557005)
In here, fans (not all) separate them (and no, fans [again, not all] don't want to lump ponies, coyotes, annoying sisters who blow up labs and superheroes with Nanoha, Haruhi, Robotech, etc. :p ).

in a snooty way. And not for all countries either, only Japanese animation. Duh, there's differences between Japanese and other countries' animations. Are the differences large enough for some people to lose their mind when someone calls an anime a "cartoon"? No.

Please understand my posts before trying to debate about something I never said.

Kirarakim 2013-02-16 21:20

Yes in Japan anime is used for all animation

But outside Japan, anime is a fan term for Japanese animation.

No one is saying because you are a fan of Japanese animation you can't also be a fan of animation from other countries but I am specifically a fan of animation from Japan so when I say I am an anime fan I do mean something very specific.

and why doesn't other countries get a specific name for their animation well for one thing no one said a special fan name can't be created for French animation, the fact that there isn't is more a reflection of the fans.

There is a huge community among fans of Japanese animation. Heck just the sheer volume of Japanese animation compared to other countries is also a factor. Is it any surprise that a special name developed for this.

Triple_R 2013-02-16 21:51

Kudryavka, here's the thing - Most adult anime fans don't want to say to their non-anime fan friends that "I'm a hardcore cartoon fan". :heh: Like it or not, "cartoon" carries a certain connotation in the west. We don't have to like it, but we do have to live with it.

And saying "I'm a hardcore animation fan" is liable to get responses like "Oh? So you're into the Pixar movies then?" or people thinking you're a poser for using 'animation' instead of 'cartoon'.

But if you say "I'm an anime fan", your non-anime fan friends may well read that as being akin to you saying "I'm a fan of foreign films". They'll probably think that makes you eccentric, but hopefully in a neat sort of way. They might even think you're more "cultured" for it, lol.

Last Sinner 2013-02-16 22:00

Actually I find one calling themselves an anime fan in the West amongst non-anime people tends to evoke one of two reactions more often than not (and these attitudes have barely changed over the last decade):

1. Oh, so you like Pokemon/Naurto/One Piece/DBZ?

2. Oh, so you like hentai...

Those are the two commonly held views, from my experience. There aren't that many willing to understand and far less that care.

Crispin Freeman once notably mentioned that a decade ago, you could mention recent titles and a good number of people in the West would know what they are, but today, mention recent titles and people are much less likely to know them. I generally find that to be true in the West. But on the flipside, back then was a weaker time for anime sales in Japan and now is their strongest, so no surprise.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.