Quote:
Originally Posted by Droplet
Now for the tricky part, does he deserve to die IRL? Actually, it's easy to decide on this... once you specify the time period. In the past, where death penalty was more rampant, he might have been put to death. But at this point in time, no, the law dictates that he won't be put to death. I talked about this because I'm sure law is the invisible but critical factor in our topic. I also established that law changes.
|
I've said this before. Human Law =/= Justice. Not modern law, not ancient law, no system of laws that will ever pass can truly represent justice, because justice is individual. Some people think Makoto got what he deserved, some thought it was too extreme.
The real question is:
Does Makoto deserve to live based on his actions? The way he should die, who should kill him are pretty much irrelevant. Does such a despicable individual deserve the chance to atone? Will he atone? Is the world better off after he died? What are your opinions?