View Single Post
Old 2008-05-22, 21:09   Link #596
JMvS
Rawrrr!
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CH aka Chocaholic Heaven
Age: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang Seung Jae View Post
For the last time: Northern Siberia is completely unsuitable for a lasting settlement in the 19th century. Only since the 1930's as norther Siberia been able to have large amount of people.


Really, I do wish people would at least KNOW the history of Siberia beofre thinking it as some Wild East, full of empty land for anyone to settle down.
Up to this point I wasn't advocating large settlements like those of southern Siberia to occur in Northern Siberia. But I still maintain that taiga environment CAN at least support low density subsistance farming or grazing and logging activites aside from furs on its southern part, making CG-verse Siberia more than a few fur-trading-outposts during the XIXth century.
I agree that its only by the XXth that mineral resources discoveries allowed it to support more people.
JMvS is offline   Reply With Quote