Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoko Takeo
See, this is why I don't trust pharmaceutical companies in general. They would make anything for the sake of money. For one thing, these people making these medicines should know that after a certain age, it's pointless to have sex in the first place because they lose any ability they have to bear children. I think it's a waste of money and dignity.
|
TBH, I don't care about the money part. The problem is that they have to prove that this product should be released to resolve a problem. But apparently, there are not so much mid-old aged women who ask for that kind of products, so to get approval, they have to prove that a certain percentages of women suffer from sexual disfunctionment. But they lie a bit in the process since that if a woman felt like not doing it only one time a year, they include her in the 43% of women who need help from them.
But not wanting to have sex is not disease. Same as not having high sex needs. problem is, a woman with low sex needs will be included by those people among the one who are ill and need this new product. Either way, poor nogistune will be included in the bag of women who need help as soon as possible
(sorry nogi, couldn't resist
)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeoTwister5
Unless of course they want to have sex solely for pleasure, which I assume is the mentality of most old people and almost all teenagers, and Viagra (which was originally not meant for erectile dysfunction) was marketed specifically for dem old folks.
|
As it is said in the article, women and men don't work the same way. And if for example the husband wants to have sex and use viagra and all to get erection, it doesn't mean the wife should take something to get aroused if she feels like not wanting sex.
I think that's part of a problem for certain couples. As I said in another post, when among a couple the man wants to have sex while the woman doesn't want, it's most of the time the woman who's accused of having a problem, while not wanting to have sex can be normal and again as i said, it doesn't mean those women don't love their husband anymore. It feels as if a woman
has a problem if she can't give pleasure whenever her husband wants it. But I hope I'm wrong
(Syn will say again that I am anti sex LOL )
So, those laboratories have to prove that there is a real problem like a disease or a malfunction. But they take some normal women with no malfunction as example of women who need to be treated for a non-existant problem. What's sad is that since it will make a lot of money (because you can imagine the machine named "advertising" being launched with it. Advertising that could start pointing fingers at some women who need hlep, but who are in fact perfectly normal), they get approval even if they lie in the studies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeoTwister5
I don't think old ladies should be using Viagra. I doubt there have been enough studies to conclude a beneficial effect of Viagra for women in general, but I suppose it should since the mechanisms of arousal are the same, except men aren't supposed to be capable of getting up consistently after every orgasm.  |
I said viagra, but IT'S NOT viagra. It's a new kind of product/medecine that is supposed to make women feel normal sex needs. AS IF, having a low libido was not normal.