View Single Post
Old 2010-09-09, 02:15   Link #17504
erneiz_hyde
18782+18782=37564
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: InterWebs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisko View Post
Battler as the culprit might not violate the red even if we assume Battler-kun refers to the Battler we know. Virgilia declared,
"Battler-kun is not the culprit. Battler-kun didn't kill anyone. This can be said of all games."
But, she didn't say those statements could be made in red for all games. Although, this would mean Battler was innocent in the fifth game.
The last part of the three red combo actually said it. You see, it's logic, for something to be true, then everything it states must also be true (hell, that definition is what started the liar paradox). Since "This can be said of all games." is already red, which means true, the sentence implying it must also be true, which means the previous two reds must be valid on all games.
__________________
erneiz_hyde is offline   Reply With Quote