Quote:
Originally Posted by Klashikari
That said, Battler didn't abuse it and again pulled some insane stunts (claiming he IS the culprit), again claiming that until it is disclosed, both their truths can be applied, while Erika was the split image of Battler back in Ep1-2.
|
How would Battler claiming that he is the culprit work with Knox commandment 1? Weren't we exposed to game-piece Battler's thoughts by having him be the narrator in EP5?
Or maybe I'm confused about how that rule works.