View Single Post
Old 2012-12-18, 09:06   Link #698
erneiz_hyde
18782+18782=37564
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: InterWebs
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
They are still more dangerous than sharks.



So how can an inanimate object be more dangerous than a living predator! Regardless of inanimate or animate, purposed or not, anything that can be used as a tool can be just as deadly.

It is the user, not the tool that is at fault. Even the inventor of the AK-47 had stated that he intended for his gun to "protect the motherland", not for it to be copied and put in the hands of terrorists or robbers in North Hollywood.
I'm not blaming the tool either. I just can't find a good reason to compare a gun with...a vending machine. That vending machines or other mundane things can be more deadly than sharks then proves to me that a lot more humans are less careful than I'd like to believe.

The creator for AK states that they are to protect the motherland...by dealing out damage or kill any invaders coming at his country. No matter how you try to sugarcoat it, firearms are still ultimately tools of destruction (again, I'm stressing that's not necessarily "evil").
__________________
erneiz_hyde is offline   Reply With Quote