|
Well I'd say since Beatrice deliberately chose not to do that in a similar situation that shows that she prefers something much simpler than that.
Other than that in regards to person X she made the argument that to prove person X is the culprit Battler has to prove all the other 18 people we know of all have alibis while this noncharacter doesn't. So I guess you' would be saying that the GM's game is so unfair that she's capable of giving all the other 'existing people' with no alibis an alibi so that these two are the final choice of 'either or' when her game is supposed to be on an equal level with the opposing player and Battler should be able to figure out the alibis of these people too without her doing that.
|