Which brings up a, "Is this legitimate" in the case that Obama will be removed from the voting in Georgia?
Also bring up the point that Georgia is not entirely Republican held...it went roughly 52% for McCain in 2008 and about 47% Obama. Though in all likelihood, without a major push it would probably vote majority Republican anyway (meaning even if Obama was on the ballot, the electoral votes would still go Republican...he's just be down a few million on the total popular vote...which would only look weird.)
Though the claim brings up the question again from a different angle. Instead of challenging where Obama was born, they are challenging based on his father's citizenship. Which actually would be a smarter move than challenging Obama's claim to be born in Hawaii, since you cannot deny his father was a British citizen from Kenya, since that is fact. What can be challenged is what the Constitution means by "natural born Citizen"...and it has been challenged before.....many times before....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen