[Keroko]

Spoiler for more game stuff:

Originally Posted by fallschirmjager

Think of it in today's standards. What's more threatening or likely to garner the largest scale retaliation if put to practice; a nation with a large military force or a nation with a nuclear arsenal?

For me, just thinking of using a Valkyria as a weapon to throw an invading enemy out of your country just brings a political shit storm to mind.

If prior to a war, then a Valkyria.

However, when I receive a report that tells me my entire army was laid to waste by a countries civilian militia then I'd list that country as my number 1 threat. Being defeated by a Valkyria is expected, though it would still spike them as my number 1 threat anyway. Being defeated by a countries civilians will mean that they are filled with a great number of soldiers the empire cannot match. Such a threat needs to be eradicated before it joins up with any other country.

Originally Posted by fallschirmjager

Well from what I can recall from the game Selvaria could destroy the Edelweiss and Shamrock with one or two hits in Chapter 12 but think of her weapon along the same terms of power as a AT Lance or an AT shell. Where it takes three/four high tech rounds to destroy a Heavy/Medium tank head on.

Oh, it's worse then that. I once had Alicia blowing up the Edelweiss, which was on the other side of the freaking level, hidden behind an armored building. I was thinking of being smart and driving the Edelweiss to a position to blow up the reinforcements. Didn't count on Alicia's beam being that destructive. >_<

And Alicia did show she was able to penetrate the tank. All she had to do then was walk inside and start rampaging.

Originally Posted by fallschirmjager

Regardless each to his own, mate. I love seeing and exchanging opinions on these sorts of things.

One thing we can all agree it's one damn good game so let's leave it at that, eh? =D

Agreed, and so do I.

Originally Posted by fallschirmjager

PS friends?

Any time.