View Single Post
Old 2009-06-29, 09:44   Link #2036
Jan-Poo
別にいいけど
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheForsaken View Post
You didn't read Battler's entire theory. He said that the chapel's door was opened from the beginning, the adults went in and locked it from the inside, then they were killed by the trap. No key was needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrellord View Post
Exactly, though your order's probably just a hair off. The door was open, the adults went in, the door was probably closed but not locked. The adults were killed by the trap, and then the killer locked the door on his/her way out.
What kind of thing are you imagining?

-Other than Kinzo's study, no door with an auto-lock exists!
-As for locking the chapel, it's completly impossible with any key other than the chapel's


If you are imagining that a "mechanism x" or a "method x" exists to lock the door without a key. Why does it need to be necessarily inside the room?

In other words let's say that

Theory A = method to kill people without being inside the room
Theory B = method to close the door without using a key

Why do you need to invoke theory A, when theory B alone would explain everything?
__________________

Jan-Poo is offline   Reply With Quote