Quote:
Originally Posted by chounokoe
Very well, that is a possibility.
Yet why then does Battler see an unresponsive Kinzo in the study during Episode 2? If he was fully hallucinating, which would be a misrepresentation of facts towards us, how can he be the detective?! If he is not the detective, how can Dlanor claim in red that he has been the detective so far. While your idea is a probability within the boundaries of the story, it does in the end create more conflict than it actually solves.
Or maybe, your basic idea is to cause conflict in other theories while not even constructing a proper theory of your own?!  |
Erika, as the detective, also sees supernatural beings while on the game board. The only foundation Battler used to justify his not being a detective was the fact that piece-Battler "saw Kinzo", despite the fact that
No one could mistake Kinzo by sight.
Note that it wasn't the imaginings of fantasy stuff, but rather
seeing something that had been stated as utterly impossible by the red text, therefore, he saw wrong. The detective would not have seen Kinzo. Period.
Therefore, the fantasy hallucinations are largely irrelevant, precisely because Erika was blatantly proclaimed the detective, but still saw supernatural stuff while on the game board.