Quote:
Originally Posted by Guardian Enzo
Using a disaster that everyone in the audience knows is coming anyway as an analog for not developing characters for half a series seems like a stretch. Character development is something that should be a relative constant, not something that can be deferred for much of a series and then dumped in. It may still happen but the fact that it hasn't already is a valid point of contention.
|
If you can’t accept that, then take my previous example:
For example: If a person walks out after seeing the first part of
Wolverine and then gives conclusion “the movie is great coz there are no plot holes and consistently smart!”, will that be valid?
Just FYI: I'm not blindly love this series. I too have suspicions that the male characters won't get decent development even after the series ended, but I try to think more objective and reserve my judgement on chara development until the show is over.
