Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
Raw source was DVD's.
|
Thank you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
But in all honesty I care not for whether my encodes are that extra 5% sharper.
|
Actually, what I meant was the opposite, but ok.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
These are not meant to replace buying the original Region 2 DVD's.
|
Of course, absolutely.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
By comparing sharpness you were making a judgement :P.
|
Maybe I expressed myself wrong (english isn't my 1st language
). When I said judgement, I meant ranting, like "L-E encoding is worse that FoT's", thus, in a negative way.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
As long as its watchable without heavy pixellation or very noticeable artefacts then all is good. If I want to be a quality whore I'll just pop a DVD in the drive :E.
|
I never mentioned pixelization. On that aspect, your encode is probably better than FoT's. (Ok, now I made a judgement.
)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gumbaloom
Oh and I wasn't being defensive. Merely asking that if people wish to draw comparisons on encode quality that they compare the right version |
OK, then the misunderstanding is cleared. I wished not to critisize you.