Quote:
|
Originally Posted by durrem
I don't think this is true. Didn't the Supreme Court rule that ficticious minors (ie depicted in story or art) were not covered by child pron laws a few years ago? I did a quick google search but couldn't find the ruling. Anyone have a link?
|
The ruling you were looking for can be found here:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bi...0&invol=00-795
CNN's report on it:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/sc...al.child.porn/
The backlash:
http://www.aclj.org/news/pornography...e_responds.asp