Quote:
Originally Posted by jjblue1
I prefer to think that, more than based on fantasy, the motive is simply OOC, sort of like the one Bern used in the tea party where Kirye and Rudolf thought it was smart to kill everyone.
It could have been a motive we would have accepted hadn't we believed they were smarter than that.
In the same way someone who doesn't know Nanjo can accept he would lie over the people being dead or not, if offered money or that Shannon would kill everyone to get Battler's attention.
It's Battler who's supposed to figure out this is not what the REAL Shannon would do and wonder why she was given such a OOC motive.
|
That's right. I tried to make the point plently of times already, that the character's behavior differ a lot between WTC3 and WTC4.
And even the "protagonist" of the story, Battler, did so.
Erika stated in EP6, that the witches game toughed Battler up, however she realized that she was talking to PieceBattler then, who did NOT go through the witches' games. In other words, even the PieceBattler from the first Episodes is different from the latter Episodes.
Same for Beato and Kinzo. In WTC3 they were the really, really "bad guys" and then both suddenly made a "
Heel Face Turn".
And this is a point that is not only reduced to "reliable scenes vs fantasy scenes". Even when comparing the scenes with the detective present, there are changes in behaviour between the Episodes.