|
Does a photograph of a 9 year old girl in a plain one-piece swimsuit sitting down with legs extended constitute Child Pornography in the west ? Because this is as far as some junior idol agencies are willing to go for the models under them in their publications and videos.
From what I can tell those models are just acting out their age and being naturally cute, a far cry from the 1990s where publication featuring actual nudity are circulated round legally.
While I can understand the nudity part, it will be harder to convince me that looking at a non-explicit photo of young child paves the road to hell.
|