Oh, sure... you can defend Ranka with your own wildly imaginative assumptions, but when someone debates them with
actual facts, you start again with "
I say"...
And when it's time to judge Sheryl by what's actually happening on the scenes (be it visually, or communicated through internal monologue), you do the exact same thing, just because you seem to dislike her character - if only because she disputes the main love interest with Ranka, eh?
How's that for an honest debate?
Honestly, it's getting hard to discuss here with you, as we do seem to be going around in circles and completely diverging from the thread's topic, with no ammount of persuasion working on either "
side"...
