Quote:
Originally Posted by Cipher
There were no "supposed" conclusions. It was the beginning of experimentation: question.
With "validity", it is a valid question because it is that: a question. Its qualification of being known as "question" is valid.
|
Fair enough. So let's hear
your reasoning; I don't ever remember you doing that. As far as I recall, you're always trying to draw others out.
Quote:
So there are important issues, in your opinion, that do not have purpose.
|
Straw Man; I'll kindly ask you not to twist my words. I was merely pointing out the logical fallacy in your assumption that just because it's been a long tradition to consider religion as an important issue, doesn't mean that it has some higher purpose; thus,
argumentum ad antiquitatem. Try personally being open to simple logic, for once.
Quote:
I'm not quite sure.
|
So you admit that statement of yours was based on
Wishful Thinking? Noted.