Quote:
That doesn't really prove anything, if you're using the argument of:
"Forgers who know of this accident often theorize that she drifted onto Rokkenjima...." - Therefore, she didn't drift onto Rokkenjima.
|
And she didn't. She DID, however, in two fictional stories that contain those "red inks" (and Hachijou, who wrote EPs 5 and 6, says there's red inks in her stories).
Unless you want to argue that someone with a psychic connection to the Meta World, the ability to say the Red Truth in the real world, the abilities of super hearing and crap like that existed on Rokkenjima, those Red Truths can only apply to a fiction.
Quote:
This has the form of:
"Forgers often theorize that [X]" - Therefore, [not X].
Which leads to an abundance of logical absurdities
"Forgers often theorize that people died on Rokkenjima." - Therefore, nobody died on Rokkenjima.
"Forgers often theorize that Rokkenjima is an island." - Therefore, Rokkenjima isn't an island.
|
This is the stupidest attempt at a logical fallacy ever.
"Forgers theorize X" so X isn't true, does not mean "forgers theorize Y", so Y isn't true. I don't know if you know this, but people can theorize things and be correct. Shocking, I know.
Quote:
|
Secoondly, her life tips say that: "On October 4, 1986, she drifted to Rokkenjima. The Ushiromiya family welcomed her as a guest. She managed to drift to the island unharmed..." How do you determine which has precedence over the other?
|
The ones that tell us more truthful information and don't involve magic happening in real life.