Quote:
Originally Posted by Renall
On the opposite side of that coin, we have ep5, where Erika insinuates that "truth" can be determined after the fact as the scenario which fits the facts presented and accepted. Whether or not it's actually true. And in a certain sense, the only way to ever collapse the cat box is for a single truth to emerge... how do we actually know it's true at all?
So what line are we walking here? Ange's subjectivity is apparently embraced. Erika's is rejected.
|
It's interesting in that angle that Ange's "subjectivity" includes fantasy scenes, while Erika.... tho her view is full of things that range from wrong to lies she's aware of... is actually making a non fantasy explanation of the events.
Is that a message?