Quote:
Originally Posted by DokEnkephalin
Speculation of a secret child isn't the introduction of a character. And Shannon and Kanon are distinct personalities, hence their deaths can be confirmed in Red when only one has been killed. Since they're also servants, see Dine's 7th.
|
They're not distinct. They talk about their unique relationship to one another constantly. Also your assertions about ep3 are not true. Basically pretty much everything you've said is entirely factually wrong and not supported by text or common sense.
Show us where Van Dine's rules are explicitly stated to be applicable to Beatrice's games, when Dlanor won't even make the assertion that her games conform to Knox when asked in ep5. Explain the distinction between the brooch and mention of a secret heir and the revelation of '67 Beatrice and the treatment of Kanon and all of that other stuff which is more or less the same degree of foreshadowing. Demonstrate that Beatrice is not
actively determining victimhood by showing how the First Twilight occurs absent her agency. Contextualize the payment boxes of ep4 without pre-planned accomplices.
Fantasy scenes still ground in reality in displaying some more important meaning. If the meaning of the ep2 midnight chapel scene is meant to relate to Rosa's activities, why then does it not give her anything of the sort of distinguish her from the other adults? Why is Beatrice the prominent figure? What is being said here? The meaning of the knock scene is clear in the subsequent use of red to remove the possibility of a knock existing; it is proof of a mutual lie and suggestive of a large conspiracy to present false information to Natsuhi.