Thread: UEFI vs BIOS
View Single Post
Old 2012-12-06, 12:25   Link #12
TJR
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
The only thing I have found useful is that UEFI boards read 3+TB HDDs. It is not like these things can run an OS without bricking anyway.
FWIW, the tweaking/overclocking community favours UEFI a lot. Something about greater flexibility, more information, and faster POST speed (because of the modular design). They gave Gigabyte much grief for sticking with Award's legacy BIOS when the competition (ASUS, ASRock, MSI) had already moved on.

Enthusiasts make up a tiny segment of the market though, so most users probably don't see much benefit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeijiSensei
Is it not possible to boot a 2+ TB drive using a standard BIOS if it is partitioned to include a small initial partition with the boot loader installed there on in the Master Boot Record?
Yes, Gigabyte previously offered a custom bootloader as a stopgap.
TJR is offline   Reply With Quote