That review didn't really come off as objective to me.
It felt as though he started watching Kanon(2002) with the sole intention of ripping it to shreds without highlighting any of the good points.
A good review has to be impartial and tell both the bad and
the good. That 'review' felt more like a personal observation than an actual review.
The following segment also highlights his ignorance of the source material,
Quote:
|
Not so in Kanon... it literally feels like it was adapted right out of the game. Good? Not as far as I'm concerned.
|
While I do better appreciate reviews that review an item on a purely standalone basis, statements like these reduces the credibility of your review. Do not compare to the game if you do not know anything about it, lest you end up with your foot in your mouth.
All in all, not a very good( or informative) review of Kanon(2002).
Cheers.