Quote:
Originally Posted by relentlessflame
If the metrics we had led to a murky conclusion, where preserving the status quo were a viable option, perhaps you could undertake this sort of feedback phase. But we are quite convinced, based on the evidence we see, that the current rep cycle must end, as the rep balance of power has gotten too far out of whack.
|
I don't doubt that power creep was a real issue.
Still, I can think of ways to deal with power creep alone.
Divide each member's rep points by 10. Or by 20. Whatever you felt was necessary to sort of "roll back the clock" to when the power balance wasn't so out of whack.
Maybe have pos rep and neg rep count for equal amounts.
Were any ideas like this considered? If so, why were they rejected?
I'm honestly pretty curious here.