|
|
Link #3361 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
To be honest, I think that there was not a single time in EP5 where someone cheated. It was always within the bounds of the rules. As long as you understand how things work you should be able to see that.
On the other hand, Spoiler for EP6:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3362 | |
|
The True Culprit
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3363 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
|
I always assumed Erika solved the knock riddle some time after the Court of Illusions since she was said to have also solved E1-4 with Natsuhi as culprit (I'd like to have seen that for E2...). It wasn't necessary to solve it for the trial itself since that was specifically regarding the culprit of the murders and the knocking/placing of the letter wasn't really a crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3364 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3365 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
However the game master isn't really caring about this so that riddle went somehow forgotten... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3366 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Quote:
She never was present, when this happened. She never could "investigate" this case. Maybe even no one ever told her about this on the gameboard. Also denying the witch is not her role. That was Battler's Anti-fantasy stance. Erika has a mystery stance and her goal is to solve the murder case. She only has to deny the witch, if she is in her way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3367 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
The original game was about denying the witch, solving all her riddles. It's said in Ep 6 also. Quote:
Basically Erika was handed the victory even through she didn't fully gained it. It's not forbidden by the game as Beato too wanted to hand the victory to Battler in EP 4 even though his theories were wrong... but it surely feels like cheating. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3369 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Quote:
Spoiler for Lambda's Memoirs & EP8:
This is the most logical conclusion to reach, I think, but for that very reason it doesn't satisfy me... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3372 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
Can you guys tell me which "answers" we got in this chapter. I've finished EP5 two weeks ago and I've already forgotten parts of it. I know the Chiru arcs aren't solely "answer arcs" but we still got some crucial information, didn't we?
- Natsuhi and Krauss adopted a child, but along with the maid looking for it, they both fell down a cliff and apparently died. But it looks like the child survived?! and is now seeking revenge. To be honest, I thought that child was Battler for a second, but I guess that wouldnt make any sense. - Not sure about this one, but I think this is the first time it's confirmed that Kinzo is actually dead and Natsuhi and friends are covering it up? - Natsuhi is not the culprit. I haven't read anything beyond EP5 (besides the beginning of EP6). Spoiler:
Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Link #3374 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
There's a lot of hidden clues in the red, that you can't get just by reading them or thinking of them alone, but it's feels so spoilerish to go back and read them now... 8)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|