2012-08-30, 20:45 | Link #1143 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
Many are from recessive genes. In order for a recessive gene to prominate the child must have both halves of it. The only way to get both halves is for both parents to carry the gene.
Others are from gender specific genes that tend to not effect one gender but do affect the other. Incest in generally considered genetically dangerous because if there is one of these mutations in their gene pool, or some illness causes a mutation somewhere along the line that can be passed on, there is a higher chance that the recessive gene or the mutated gene will become prominate just because of the limited gene pool the DNA has to work with. If the family has no gene problems, than it is relatively safe. It is unknown to me if the low amount of gene swapping outside that family will eventually result in damaged genes or not. Cloning dramas tend to show repeated cloning on a few select being results in an eventual degrading of the produced clones over time. Be it that the DNA is having to make do without the proper materials or someone's idea that nature doesn't like it and eventually starts breaking it down I don't know. These are sci-fi authors. Most of which seem to prefer traditional people over cloning.
__________________
|
2012-08-30, 22:14 | Link #1144 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Supersonic Flying Wing Nabs $100,000 from NASA:
"An aircraft that resembles a four-point ninja star could go into supersonic mode by simply turning 90 degrees in midair. The unusual "flying wing" concept has won $100,000 in NASA funding to trying becoming a reality for future passenger jet travel." See: http://news.yahoo.com/supersonic-fly...155935257.html |
2012-08-31, 07:45 | Link #1145 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gensokyo
|
Quote:
(Only one of them is enough) -be permanent bipedelist -Control fire -Death cult -Use of advanced tools -Art -Articulated language There's 8 of them but I kind of forgot the others two. As for general animal, distinguing two species is as always hard ... Depend on wich criteria you base yourself i.e. interfecondity, ecological, physical similitude, or phylogenetic. It's not something you can solely decide on the DNA differences. Remembering all of this was hard, atama ga ittaiiiiiiiiiii |
|
2012-08-31, 14:59 | Link #1146 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
"Thinking" man started roaming Earth a couple of thousands years after the "curious" man killed himself by not improving at all.... Currently, "idiot"man is becoming the dominant species nowadays... |
|
2012-09-01, 14:46 | Link #1148 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gensokyo
|
Yes and no, that's the main criteria biologist do use, but it has its limit. Animals don't do a "circle" in the ability of breeding.
To explain it bluntly : Bird A lives in India, he can breed with bird B living in Cambodge, bird B can breed with bird C living in China, but C and A can't have a fertil offspring together. and so we are kind of blocked there ... another example is how two dogs while being on the same species can't have an offspring together And i'm sure you understand why, it simply "doesn't fit" (I'm obviously talking about how the belly of the chihuaha would burst if the female were to carry a puppy of the second dog). Well in short it's compliced, the real guys who decide what belongs where doesn't do it half-assedly, and they say it's quite funny to watch the war once it's decided ... for a biologist that is. On a personnal view, it seems that the phylogetical way of defining a species is the best, or should I say the "most" accurate, but it has its own problem ... For example fish and reptil simply don't exist if you use such a way of defining. Quite problematic for common human. Last edited by Zakoo; 2012-09-01 at 14:59. |
2012-09-02, 05:26 | Link #1149 | |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Self regenerating tooth treatments? Anti-obesity pills? I'm down for that! |
|
2012-09-02, 05:35 | Link #1150 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
2012-09-02, 06:40 | Link #1151 |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
I read every page. From 2013, to 2099. Incredible stuff.
Easily my favorite bit of information, was about how by 2055 Earth based telescopes will be able to make out sufrace features of planets light years away. Mind blowing. An awesome website, might one of the best out there. |
2012-09-03, 16:31 | Link #1153 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Elon Musk says he's planning a 'supersonic, electric hover jetplane':
"Hecamillionaire space cowboy Elon Musk has revealed new and ambitious plans for the future - among them the idea of a "supersonic electric jet" able to make hovering landings and takeoffs." See: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09...upersonic_jet/ |
2012-09-03, 17:25 | Link #1154 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Boffins create super-muscular 'Hulk' mice: Humans next:
"Topflight biology brains say they have identified a key protein, the furtling of which could allow massively increased muscular development and strength in human beings. Genetic manipulation of the "Grb10" compound has already been tried out in mice, producing "hyper-muscular" rodents capable of almost super- murine feats." "The scientists thus far are viewing potential Grb10 tweaking as a method for helping human patients to battle muscle wasting diseases, but there can be little doubt that the techniques - if successful - would also be abused by the bodybuilding and rogue-secret-military-special-operations-organisation communities - and indeed perhaps by the time-poor or lazy." See: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09..._mousey_hulko/ |
2012-09-04, 13:32 | Link #1155 | |
Secret Society BLANKET
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 times the passion of normal flamenco
|
Gizmodo: Spinal Stem Cell Injections Help Reverse Paralysis
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|