2010-01-13, 20:01 | Link #1421 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
is this gonna be a massive screw, or is this gonna be better than sc1, well, the answer lays on how they set their biz model, if stuff goes right and they get the 15M dollar objective expansions and everyting else will make this the best game of history, but if they dont, then we can just go and play our freakin xbox again
|
2010-01-13, 21:30 | Link #1422 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Malaysia
|
Well I think basically now Zerg desperately need a good AOE spells that can rivaled the iconic Dark Swarms. I mean look at Terran and Protoss. Both got pretty decent AOE spells that can changed the tide of the battles or harrassing. What are Zerg got now? *Sigh*.
|
2010-01-14, 01:23 | Link #1423 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
Seriously, try playing unpatched version 1 of vanilla Starcraft. It's not as good as you remember it was. It would take time for SC2 to mature as a game.
__________________
|
|
2010-01-14, 01:47 | Link #1424 | |
The Dark Knight
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From the deepest abyss in the world, where you think?
Age: 38
|
Quote:
As years pass people will always talk about how great the first game was and such and completely forgot all of the major flaws that were inherent in its first round while critizing the sequel about how it's all crap and such. |
|
2010-01-14, 19:33 | Link #1425 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Malaysia
|
Quote:
Yeah. Especially the version before 1.08. And the strats and technicques also developed along with times. In the past, who would know about the stack mutas and muta micros? Who would use first forge fast expand and Corsair/Reaver in PvZ? It take time for SC to developed until what it is today. So don't expect SC2 will be perfect in balance in its first release. |
|
2010-01-14, 20:18 | Link #1427 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
On the battlenet forums someone quoted from the archives of the old discussion back in '97 for SC1 how the phylosophy was to roll it out soon (or at least with the set schedule) and fix it later. Which has obviously not been the case for SC2 as it seems.
__________________
|
2010-01-15, 01:53 | Link #1428 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
The balancing really couldn't be considered finished until 3-4 updates later, after the customers have had a shot at trying to break the game, and pro Koreans attempt to twist SC2 Game mechanics like a pretzel. In this day and age, when every can get their game updated online, dragging out the beta test too long wouldn't be that much of an advantage. One year in Korea's pro-circuit would dig up more bugs and exploits than 5 years of internal Beta testing.
__________________
|
2010-01-19, 05:32 | Link #1430 | |
~AD~
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Quote:
Well if it goes like this, then it mean that they will always try balancing through the series... |
|
2010-01-19, 05:41 | Link #1431 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
Having two expansion packs means they can have twice the chance to update the unit lineup to reflex the latest military strategies available and/or lacking to the players.
__________________
|
|
2010-02-11, 05:26 | Link #1437 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Maybe I'll give some basic impressions if I do get into the Beta. |
|
2010-02-11, 05:58 | Link #1439 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
The news was also posted twitter. And Battle.net Preview is up.
@ Solstice Cross: Goliaths are the new Thor more or less.
__________________
|
Tags |
blizzard, starcraft, windows |
|
|