2004-01-25, 14:18 | Link #1 |
エリック
|
Server down on internet but up locally
My server for my website has been down for about a week. it all started when my ip address changed, i redid my DNS and fixed iis 5.5 to work with the new ip(i set it to broadcast on all available ip's) i went to my website and it worked. about a day later, i tried to get something off my website and the connection timed out. i went back and took down my firewall, undid all my filters and used a proxy to see if i could reach it. that did nothing. i then redid iis and all of my internet related items(network connections, my router). this didn't help either. i have come to the point where i am making a new server just to host my website. the only thing left for me to do is to uninstall iis and try to reinstall again. any help/comments would be greatly appreciated.
__________________
|
2004-01-25, 16:40 | Link #3 | |
エリック
|
Quote:
the closest thing to fixing it is to cut two somethings off. but anyways, i have checked everything and it seems to be working fine. it is almost as if the firewall is blocking all incoming connections but i still can get on the internet. i don't know what to do. i'm uninstalling iis right now, let's hope that works.
__________________
|
|
2004-01-25, 17:11 | Link #5 |
エリック
|
well, well, well, what do you know, it still isn't working.
i even changed network cards, it still isn't working. i just need a new server. (donations accepted) goto http://ravenchild.sytes.net/ to donate
__________________
|
2004-01-25, 23:36 | Link #6 |
エリック
|
i put together a new server, a PIII 866, 64Mb RAM, G-Force4 ti4200(overclocked even on a server), windows server 2003, 6 SCSI CD-ROMs, a 43Gb SCSI, a 10Gb SCSI, a 6Gb IDE, and 900 watts of power (a 500 and a 400). my case is huge 2.5 feet high, 1.5 feet wide, and 1.5 in depth.
__________________
|
2004-01-26, 14:29 | Link #8 |
AT Field
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: #animesuki
Age: 14
|
my experience of using a server not just as a server but as a server too (complicated uh ) was quite bad with *nix.
i needed to control the desktop remotely through vnc, what is quite a mess and not very fast with X (don't tell me it's possible, i know! but i don't want any virtual desktop!). so i have to stay with my w2k to be able to watch tv properly. the hdd performance was quite poor too :/ when activating dma with hdparm, my console was flooded with errors, and i achieved 20MBit ... w2k allows me to transfer at 60MBit (ftp) even if the listing is slower. but yes, *nix is good for a server env without any graphical env. my p90 works very well with it. even if *again* the hdd performance is poor, but i don't care for that one (scsi quantum fireball 6.4GB > ~2.5MB/s for the read-speed)
__________________
|
2004-01-26, 15:03 | Link #9 | |
r00t for life
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: /dev/null
|
Quote:
|
|
2004-01-26, 15:11 | Link #10 | |
AT Field
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: #animesuki
Age: 14
|
Quote:
and send that app back to the main display/tty when i am over?
__________________
|
|
2004-01-26, 15:30 | Link #11 | |
r00t for life
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: /dev/null
|
Quote:
|
|
2004-01-27, 07:03 | Link #13 |
AT Field
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: #animesuki
Age: 14
|
it really depends on your needs.
in my case, win2k is just an os to run certain applications, present on *nix too there are many option on win2k3 that i won't ever use (and others i don't anything about ) since it's aimed to be used for nt domains ...
__________________
|
|
|