|
View Poll Results: Shin Sekai Yori - Episode 25 [End] Rating | |||
Perfect 10 | 69 | 57.50% | |
9 out of 10 : Excellent | 37 | 30.83% | |
8 out of 10 : Very Good | 7 | 5.83% | |
7 out of 10 : Good | 2 | 1.67% | |
6 out of 10 : Average | 3 | 2.50% | |
5 out of 10 : Below Average | 0 | 0% | |
4 out of 10 : Poor | 2 | 1.67% | |
3 out of 10 : Bad | 0 | 0% | |
2 out of 10 : Very Bad | 0 | 0% | |
1 out of 10 : Painful | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2013-03-24, 09:31 | Link #121 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
I think that it's pretty clear that the human villagers are nothing like modern people, while the queerats are nowhere so dissimilar. The trap that Shinsekai Yori introduces is that we are supposed to think "What would we be like if we had these powers?" when the real question is "Which group describes us?"
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 09:47 | Link #122 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
The killing of children, scientific & genetic modifications all came about because of the development of these psychic powers. So of course we would not have developed these things in our society yet. So no we are not more similar to the PK users or the monster rats. They are both humans and we don't know which one we will be. And each of us individually may be part of a different group.
__________________
Last edited by Kirarakim; 2013-03-24 at 09:59. |
|
2013-03-24, 10:04 | Link #123 | |
今宵の虎徹は血に飢えている
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 10:42 | Link #124 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
While I don't agree with the methods employed for the punishment of squealer, if somebody had to be punished that way, squealer would have been my choice. However, this might be due to the fact that I do have an overwhelming amount of sympathy of what the Saki and her village went through.
I can't see Bakenezumi as human. Sure, their species may have once been human, but regardless, through inducing mutations within their genome, they aren't anymore. They're an entirely different species. The village controlling the Bakenezumi does not seem that much different from today's society where humans have dominion over every other species. All organisms on earth evolved from a single ancestor, yet we don't fret over killing a cow to eat a steak in today's society. Granted that there are motions to call for more humane killing of livestock and the punishment of Squealer would have not been tolerated in today's society. |
2013-03-24, 11:43 | Link #126 | |
Kana Hanazawa ♥
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: France
Age: 37
|
Quote:
Both the humans and the rats represent different aspects of humanity. Neither faction is more human that the other nor closer to us. Kirakim is right. We are both and neither. The viewer is free to identify with neither, either or both. It's entirely up to personal appreciation. There are no absolutes in this story. The humans are not entirely evil and the queerats are not entirely good, and vice-versa. They're simply... humans.
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 12:25 | Link #127 | ||
Criminal Unrequitor
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Quote:
One of the main problems, as you've said, is that the way humans treat Queerats aren't as different as how we treat livestock in today's society (and I think the Queerats have it worse) when that's not how it's supposed to be. Quote:
__________________
|
||
2013-03-24, 15:55 | Link #129 |
Math Ninja
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ventura County CA
Age: 59
|
A fascinating end to a fascinating series. The original novelist had a lot of things to say, and gave us a lot of things to think about.
The entire world has been reshaped around the fact that a certain percentage of humans gained a power that could potentially wipe out the entire species. Everything in the village society is based on the need to keep that power contained. But the real threats to humanity lurk underneath - arrogance, greed, lust for power and vengeance, hatred and violence. And these things are not dealt with at the end. Do Saki and Satoru really have reason to hope that the world will be a better place for their child? I didn't see many signs of it. The village's treatment of Squealer was nothing short of barbaric, and they go right back to being "gods" who decide the fates of the queerat colonies. Saki and Satoru figure out where the queerats came from and who they really are, but they don't do anything with that knowledge. Ten years later, there's no sign of anything being different. And the queerats aren't any better. Sure, you can argue that they're fighting back against their oppressors, but they'll never succeed as long as they maintain the cycle of violence. Armed resistance is ultimately doomed to failure, and only reinforces the resolve of the Cantus users. (I always said the queerats needed a Gandhi and not a Bin Laden.) The whole reason they look like rats instead of humans is because the Cantus users were afraid of being wiped out if Death Feedback prevented them from defending themselves. The only gripe I had about the final episode was that killing the kid felt too quick and too easy - but then again, they had to have time for everything that came later, so I guess that's okay. |
2013-03-24, 19:19 | Link #130 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Quote:
So to be fair, the take home message for the last part is that almost 100% of the viewers will either die or become queerats. Statistically, I think it's pretty safe to assume that we are in the queerats' shoes and that pretty much sums up the purpose of the last reveal. The last reveal is just to reverse our psychology. I dunno why people are still arguing we might be the "Saki/Satoru" group when you only have 0.3% (or close to none) to belong with the demigods. Last edited by moredrowsy; 2013-03-24 at 19:38. |
|
2013-03-24, 19:20 | Link #131 | ||||
DRRR!!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
It's possible that he placed importance on his being human and felt wronged for what had been done to his ancestors. Then there is also the possibility that if he'd gotten the courts to acknowledge his –and by association his kinds– humanity most of his jailers and jurors would have literally died of shame right then and there and the ones that wouldn't die would be rendered unable to harm any other Bakenezumi, Squealer included of course. Stripped of his subordinates, his messiah and even his clothes (leaving only his dignity); exclaiming that he was in fact human was his final defiant indiscretion and his only remaining weapon. Quote:
Maybe, just maybe Squealer was simply tired of all the bullying. It's strikes me that Squealer is a lot like the lowest raking of the naked mole rats that Saki kept. Constantly getting stepped on for being the smallest, for being the least fit, the least dominant. When he was given the role of single literate member of his colony, I image it was because it was perceived to be a waste to make an actual fit one do it because a stronger specimen could have gotten more hunting or gathering done. Except through sheer knowledge, inventiveness and perseverance he was able to make his colony prosper and rise in the ranks and each time he rose in the ranks he would make those under him stop the bullying and domineering and that felt good. But no matter how much power and knowledge he accumulated there always seemed to be people above him bullying others. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
2013-03-24, 19:55 | Link #132 | ||
DRRR!!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
PS: Gandhi's brand of non-violence relied on instigating violence and causing social unrest. Quote:
|
||
2013-03-24, 20:26 | Link #133 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
|
I don't see a point in debating what "we" the viewers would be in the world of this story... given that the entire point is, I think, that the two societies are fundamentally very similar, the difference being that one is oppressed by the other. But morally neither is any better than the other - and the oppressed side would happily switch places and be oppressors themselves.
I mean, people here love to hate the human side (because they kill children, because they do all that creepy stuff, because they oppress the bakenezumi, etc.) and it seems to me that many people downplay the human side of the story, dismissing the experiences of humans as irrelevant since they're evil anyway. But are the bakenezumi any better, with their almost constant wars, conflicts, oppression? (kiiind of familiar...) And is the world Squealer was trying to create any better than the world of the humans? A society built on genocide, slavery and genetic engineering of their own kind? Hmmm, where have we seen this before....... |
2013-03-24, 20:37 | Link #134 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tennessee
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Farewell, Squealer. You were somewhat of a bastard, but a charismatic and fascinating enough one that you're hard not to like. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
2013-03-24, 20:42 | Link #135 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Quote:
|
|
2013-03-24, 20:51 | Link #136 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Agreed and I want to say it because I know I debated with him a few times throughout this series but I always enjoyed doing so.
Actually in general I enjoyed debating & discussing with everyone. I don't want to name names because I am sure I will forget someone important but I had a lot of fun on these boards and enjoyed everyone's posts whether I agreed or disagreed. Quote:
Triple R please don't kill me!
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 21:12 | Link #137 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The queerats are mostly ugly and little , they don't want to be assimiled to them
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 21:15 | Link #138 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
The point is BOTH groups represent different factions of humanity. Neither side is the side we should identify with. And neither side is entirely good or bad. It's just not black and white like that.
__________________
|
|
2013-03-24, 21:30 | Link #139 |
Romanticist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 33
|
I figured they were going to bring up that little quip eventually, and I can't say the solution caught me by surprise. I'm just not particularly fond of the clumsy way made the reveal, and in the final episode no less. But that's a minor matter.
In the end, the humans and the queerats represent two ends of a continuum. One enforces its law by authoritarian rule, using extreme force whenever necessary. The other side is a chaotic free-for-all where warmongering clans kill and invade each other for the sake of dominance. Both sides are a mess if you think about it. On the side of the humans, much emphasis is placed on enforcing conscious self-control at gunpoint. Here, we have society that actively attempts to dull the more violent elements of human nature, but it is exactly that which dehumanizes its inhabitants. The Cantus here can simultaneously be interpreted as a burden that must be suppressed and as a device for sustaining the current power hierarchy. On the other hand, you have the queerats that embrace those very tendencies that the humans shun. As a result, their societies are fragmented and engaged in a perpetual power struggle, but at the same time, it is that greed that drives them to new heights. It is what allows them to challenge tried paradigms in order to evolve. Both sides are caricatures of the best and worst sides of humanity. This all leads me to wonder: What exactly was this show trying to say? Similar to Psycho-Pass, this seems again to be an ending where very little was changed in terms of the societal constructs in play. In the end, even Saki, after learning the truth, could only continue to perceive the queerats as beasts as she killed Squealer.
__________________
|
2013-03-24, 21:33 | Link #140 | |
Kyuuketsuki
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|