2010-01-25, 23:52 | Link #5681 |
Onee!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
Pretty sure it's more the mindset: "if I have alot of kids, they'll be able to support me (by working) later on"
or "if I have a lot of kids it'll increase the chance of some surviving and supporting me later on" or yeah maybe just they didn't plan on it.. -_-
__________________
|
2010-01-25, 23:53 | Link #5682 | |
Moving in circles
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 49
|
Shrine's town makes 1B yen, thanks to Lucky Star
Quote:
|
|
2010-01-26, 00:46 | Link #5683 | |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-01-26, 00:47 | Link #5684 | |
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
1. i will get more attentions (octomom) 2. i will get more welfare.
__________________
|
|
2010-01-26, 01:10 | Link #5685 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
One other important factor for more kids is the lack of education, hence the shortsightedness.
Consider the following black humor that was popular back a while ago in China. A visitor held a conversation with a kid in a poor and remote village. "what are you doing?" "Shepherding." "Why?" "To make money." "What do you do with the money?" "Get married." "What do you do after getting married?" "Raise a few kids. " "What will the kids do when they grow up?" "Shepherd." The moral from the story was that kid should be in school to break this vicious circle. Unfortunately the Chinese government seems to care much less about these important things nowadays.
__________________
|
2010-01-26, 01:25 | Link #5686 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: China
|
Quote:
Education... Not sure of it as a cause, to be honest. Certainly in China, historically, there are major tenets of thought that favor education, but they also combine that with a belief in family. The trend of a highly educated population delaying marriage and the start of a nuclear family is tied more closely, IMHO, to the need of more time to settle down in a career.
__________________
|
|
2010-01-26, 05:13 | Link #5688 | |
Banned
|
The Supreme Court of The United States apparently tore apart the McCain-Feingold act which was supposed to limit the amount that any single person or concern could contribute to a political candidate.
While the decision apparently doesn't remove the restrictions on campaign contributions it recognizes the right of corporations to purchase advertisements on their own behalf in order to express support for or to attack political candidates any way they see fit, which more or less circumvents the McCain-Feingold act. Are we getting close to the cyberpunk imagined era of corporate domination over politics and/or does this mean that corporations are one step closer to being able to hand pick candidates for office who are variable to their interests via the use of near limitless funds for influential advertisement? Quote:
|
|
2010-01-26, 05:17 | Link #5689 | |
cho~ kakkoii
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-01-26, 05:21 | Link #5690 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
There's some dispute about the "elected" part but meh...
Yes, we are indeed screwed in the US.... welcome to Neocron, the fascist future of undying immortal artificial entity overlords (otherwise known as corporations).
__________________
|
2010-01-26, 05:28 | Link #5691 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
Last edited by Kaioshin Sama; 2010-01-26 at 05:41. |
|
2010-01-26, 06:01 | Link #5692 |
The AnimeSuki Pet kitten
IT Support
|
Well, if the world did become an apocalyptic wasteland, then I wouldn't have to hear the numerous complaints about people and hook turning, among other things like Climate Change and all that other nonsense that appears every time I switch on my television.
I find it hard to believe we'll cause something like that to happen though. Climate Change will still happen, crap will still flood the air waves, and people will still fail to negotiate a right turn from the left hand lane. (Yes, I'm cynical, and somewhat ignorant)
__________________
Last edited by Haruka_Kitten; 2010-01-26 at 06:04. Reason: Redundancy punctuation |
2010-01-26, 08:21 | Link #5694 | |
A Hope of Light beckons..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: KL.
Age: 39
|
Quote:
He wanted FFXIII to be based on his consituency, which is in Kyushu, if I'm not wrong. The offer was flatly refused by SqEx, for reasons unknown. Maybe they didn't want to see profits leak. But FF VS XIII is based on Shibuya... |
|
2010-01-26, 11:57 | Link #5695 |
Baruk Khazad
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: finland
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8480161.stm
A French parliamentary committee has recommended a partial ban on women wearing Islamic face veils. The committee's near 200-page report has proposed a ban in hospitals, schools, government offices and on public transport. Goddamn ironic. Some countries are condemned because they force women to wear certain clothes, and now one of the countries doing the condemning wants to prohibit women from wearing certain clothes. Boils down to same thing in my opinion, regulating what you are allowed to wear. A democracy shouldn't even contemplate passing laws like these, and I say this as a near-militant atheist who doesn't give a turd about Islam, Christianity or any other religion. If those women want to wear veils that completely cover their faces, LET THEM. Not letting them wear them is just as vile as forcing them to wear them. |
2010-01-26, 12:17 | Link #5696 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-01-26, 12:23 | Link #5697 | ||
Not Enough Sleep
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: R'lyeh
Age: 48
|
Quote:
Quote:
What is the difference between eating cats and dogs vs eating pigs and cow? isn't it hypocritical of the animal rights activist to pat themselves on the back about getting dogs and cats off menu while eating a burger?
__________________
|
||
2010-01-26, 13:55 | Link #5698 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
I find this pretty bizarre myself... meat is meat. If its raised for eating, its meat. The "pet" thing is a cultural artifact. I mean... they're all mammals and therefore close enough on the "Hey, I'm here" sentience list to feel uncomfortable about.
__________________
|
2010-01-26, 15:13 | Link #5699 |
ショ ン (^^)
IT Support
|
I guarantee if these people were starving their little pointless argument would go right out the window while they licking their chops. If you can kill it then you can eat it. Just because humanity has labeled these animals pets does not change the fact that they are still animals.
__________________
|
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|