2011-03-13, 08:26 | Link #721 |
Senior Member
|
AIEA said again that radiaction level continuosly fall down near Fukushima...
Fukushime daiichi is more similar to thre mile island...and definitivly is close to impossible obrati same result of Chernobyl.. Ok it's not a good thing..but is wuite different from what the terrible wester mass media try to say (a Chernobyl 2 OMGOMGOMGOMG)
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 08:35 | Link #723 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
The $2b has to last for at least 4-6 months since they have to construct quake-proof buildings which might take longer to build. The abovementioned points are simply going to make the cost of rebuilding much higher subsequently. In trading, there is something called the 6-month rule, in which a major news event will take 6 months for the real results to surface. This market delay might give the government a window of opportunity to get materials at spot prices (which may be much lower than later), but there is too little room for error because Japan has a high standards and cost of living.
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 08:40 | Link #724 | |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 08:45 | Link #725 | ||
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
|
Quote:
Quote:
My argumentative chain is like this: The outer containment's explosion is most likely a result of oxyhydrogen exploding inside the outer most containment. If oxyhydrogen is in the outer containment, there must be a H2 source. The most likely H2 source is the core containment. Under high temperatures the inner coolant (water) reacts with the zirkonium in the fuel/moderator rods: Zr + 2 H2O => ZrO2 + 2 H2. However, this reaction requires tremendous temperatures. Temperatures that are likely reached in a (partial) melt down of the rods (not the whole reactor, just the rods). If these rods melt down however, they expose the radioactively long living fuel to the coolant (now a mixture of H2, ZrO2 and H2O). Typically the H2 will be at the ceiling of the inner containment because it not as dense as the H2O. This however, further reduces the cooling capacities of the top of the core containment. So, the in a sense, partial melt down (only parts of the rods melt), is at the top of the core containment. This is where the H2 is, and hence it is very likely that the H2 gets very contaminated with isotopes of the fuel (which are also exposed at the top). When this process is going on, and the pressure reaches critical limits, the inner coolant must be vented off partially in order to prevent worse things happen (like a breach of the inner containment). You can call this a malfunction by design. However, you can as well call it what it is: for the moment of the release of the inner coolant the inner containment was not intact. Purposefully not intact. Now, under normal conditions, the released coolant is caught in the outer containement. Typically, it is expected to be just activated water vapor, that means water that contains a higher ratio of tritium. However its possible to let this decay into normal water vapor using special treatment. However, it is very likely that the released coolant was not just water vapor but the fission by-product contaminated H2. One of the nastier isotopes that can be released this way is Caesium 137. The inner containment was certainly closed after the pressure was released, but the contaminated coolant is now in the outer most containment, the last casing that keeps it away from the environment. Now lets assume they released H2, and the H2 was contaminated with Cs 137 and it mixed with the surrounding air into oxyhydrogen, then all that was needed now is enough heat to make the contaminated oxyhydrogen explode. At this point all the containments are more or less contaminated already. When the outer containment was blown away, most of the contaminated inner coolant was released into the environemt. But still, the highest contamination should remain inside the reactor containments in this order: 1) core containment - steel (most contaminated) 2) pressure release system (severly contaminated) 3) inner concrete containment (severly contaminated) 4) outer containment - now blown away (contaminated) What they do now, is to flood the contaminated containment (my guess is either the inner conrete containment or the outer containement). But there will be radiatioactive isotopes in both anyway, so it is not important to know that in details. There won't be a continuous (over a longer period of time) release of the Cs 137 and other fission by-products as in the case of Chernobyl. But that doesn't make the already released material go away. It will be lingering there in the surrounding areas for years to come. Radioactivity is nothing that is harmless until you reach a certain dosis. It is always a game of probability when you are exposed to it. There is natural radioactivity, background radiation that can cause leukemia and cancer in you at any given time with a certain probability. If you add to the natural radiation the radiation from the fission products of the powerplant (that btw. is not equally distributed over an area) this probability can only increase. The question that remains is, how much does it increase the risk. And personally I wouldn't trust the officials in this matter. If you live next to such an accident and you find out, that you were lied at or they merely miscaclulated the risks ... in a few years from now. Then it might already be too late and you have leukemia/cancer. Of course you could still argue then, that it was beause of the natural radiation and not from the power plant... but personally I am not into gambling so much, that I would want to stay in that region. Well, what do I think? Do I think there is imminent danger? No. So, we basically agree on that part. But I am more concerned with long term results.
__________________
|
||
2011-03-13, 08:53 | Link #727 |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
I did some trading analysis and discussed it with a couple of my friends working in banks this morning. We based it on the simple idea of money flow, so it is mostly fundamental and nothing technical.
Money is flowing into Japan according to the forex charts (anything against the JPY was dropping, so which means money is flowing into the country from all directions), so this means the JPY is highly valuated. But the problem is -overvaluation-, which caused the US subprime crisis because people are thinking that the USD has strong backing of assets. The overvaluation can be due to the homes being rebuilt, but one has to know that these homes are not for sale, so it means that there are absolutely no profits earned. One might argued that the construction firms are the ones being paid, so technically a profit is still being earned, however the bidding process for government construction projects are usually reverse bids or at generally low market prices with business incentives applied to the construction business when operating in Japan. Energy and food prices are pretty high right now, so the money flowing into Japan might be flowing out once the mass-purchasing begins. I have yet so see which rate is faster, so I probably need a week or a month to be able to do a more critical analysis.
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 08:56 | Link #728 |
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
|
No its not broken, it was opened for a brief period of time though. This is what I call malfunctioning by design. It had to be opened/vented to stay intact, which caused it to be not intact (on purpose) for a brief period of time. However, the stuff that is inside the core containment is most likely is broken and partly melted.
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 08:58 | Link #729 |
Disabled By Request
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The 305
Age: 30
|
The to aru majutsu no index light novel author illustrator and staff for the anime is all safe.
http://r-s.sakura.ne.jp/ |
2011-03-13, 09:07 | Link #730 | |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
Quote:
by the way can you make your post less complicated
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 09:10 | Link #731 |
著述遮断
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
My question to the Anit-Nuclear groups: What happens when humanity eventually develops fusion power ?
Are they going to protest that too ? I got wind that these reactors were originally marked by TEPCO for shut down and retirement, before the earth quake and tsunami. Is this true ? |
2011-03-13, 09:18 | Link #732 | |
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
|
Quote:
Imagine you have a balloon that is filled with poison. Imagine the balloon can withstand high temperatures, but it cannot take too much pressure. Now, imagine the poison becomes very hot and is increasing the pressure to the balloons hull. Imagine there is a release valve at the bottom of the balloon, that releases the contained material (poison) until the pressure is within the allowed levels, so that the balloon is not rupturing (and possibly releasing all the material/poison that is inside of it). Now if you defined, that the function of the balloon is, to never release any poison. What do you call it, when it has to release part of the poison, to prevent its own destruction (and complete malfunctioning). Thats what I call malfunctioning by design. It had to be not intact for brief period of time (releasing poison against its defined purpose) to stay structurally intact. You can also call it a trade off. However, the result is, that it still released poison in the end. No, since the matter is complicated. I can't help it, nor is english my first language. edit: @Zetsubo: fusion power is by way of camparison much safer then fission power in a case of emergency (that there is less fuel inside, and that the fusion will stop immediatly if the fuel becomes "dirty" in an accident is only one reason)
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 09:19 | Link #733 | |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
Quote:
about the reactor thing IIRC the planned to upgrade it this year. i am thinking after this quake they decide to retired it anyway
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 09:23 | Link #735 | |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
Quote:
by the way my english is also not 1st but my writing style is simple.
__________________
|
|
2011-03-13, 09:44 | Link #736 |
Hige
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: God only knows
|
Before - After satelite photos
https://picasaweb.google.com/1180792...3600944/Japan# http://www.examiner.com/natural-disa...=30773646#main
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 10:22 | Link #737 |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
Volcano Shinmoedake in the southwest errupted
Hiromitsu Arakawa’s tiny home in the town of Minami-soma was torn from its foundations by the first wave of the tsunami that crashed ashore Friday afternoon, the defense ministry said. Mr. Arakawa saw his wife slip away in the deluge, and he clung to the roof as the house drifted away. He was discovered late Sunday morning, still on his roof, 9 miles south of his hometown and 9 miles out to sea
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 10:40 | Link #738 |
cho~ kakkoii
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
|
We saw that coming considering Japan is home to one of the most volcanically active region in the world.
Can I also ask people to hold those debates about the consequence of fission for a later time, or at least till the dust settle? The bad news for the Japanese people are piling up without adding any other incentive. When things are really really bad, all we can do is to stay positive, hope against hope. These type of debate is for people who are not in the midst of this chaos. This type of debate also won't encourage the people who can use every ounce of encouragement at this very bleak time. Keep them in your prayer and well wishes and do what you can to help them. We will have plenty of time talk about the rest later. They are not out of it yet.
__________________
|
2011-03-13, 11:00 | Link #740 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
For that scale disaster? No. No one can be prepared for 10+ meter waves after a nearly 9.0 earthquake. My preparedness is living about 20 miles inland and 30 meters above sea level.
__________________
|
Tags |
disaster, japan, tsunami |
|
|