2010-05-14, 18:29 | Link #121 |
100Shots100Hits LuluLaLu
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Inside your heart...
Age: 35
|
I find the whole thing silly to be quite honest. JRPG is just a term used to describe games from japan which have certain rpg elements. It's just a common term and people shouldn't throw a hissy fit over the whole thing particularly the bioware guy who feels the need to 'define' what an rpg is.
|
2010-05-14, 19:52 | Link #122 | |
Sceptic
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nowhere
|
Quote:
This argument is 20 years old mind to know, and arguing about semantics of 20 years ago is beyond silly. So called character creation in WRPGs isn't any creation, you choose between several preset classes and dozen of avatars/portraits, in Suikoden there are 108 unique characters, no WRPG ever offered that, and they all have personalities unlike your created characters in WRPGs. So no, he is bloody wrong, FF13 is an RPG, JRPGs are RPGs and WRPGs are RPGs. RPG is just very diverse genre. |
|
2010-05-14, 20:39 | Link #123 | ||||
Gregory House
IT Support
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||||
2010-05-14, 22:00 | Link #124 |
100Shots100Hits LuluLaLu
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Inside your heart...
Age: 35
|
Er..D&D has defined what RPG's have been since their inception, The japanese took some elements from that and made their own kind of games. I don't see what's the problem here. Unless were going to be debating the legitimacy of the word use.
It's understandable though, People have debated for years whether zelda is an rpg or an action-adventure game. I just think its quite silly to make an issue out of the intentional attempt to 'troll' the overzealous Jrpg fans. |
2010-05-15, 03:22 | Link #125 |
Banned
|
Why is it so hard to see the difference?
Wrpgs give a lot of freedom at tempering with the set statistics and abilities a character has during his creation. Good and balanced Wrpgs allow the player to do only specific actions according to his class. If he wants to do other actions, he has to play the game again and chose a different class. Jrpgs are not like that. They focus more on the personalities and backdrops of a character, which usually has little to do with his statistics. Thus Wrpgs have more balanced and numerically excused gameplay, while Jrpgs have more interesting characters and stories. |
2010-05-15, 04:05 | Link #126 |
RUN, YOU FOOLS!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Formerly Iwakawa base and Chaldea. Now Teyvat, the Astral Express & the Outpost
Age: 44
|
What wrpgs have tried to achieve is to reach the sandbox level that pen & paper rpgs have allowed.
Let's take Deus EX, firstly, in combat, you can go with brute force all guns blazing, or sneaking or hacking sentry guns against the enemies. And that is just the combat. I remember one scene in the bar in Hong Kong arc. When I played the game for the first time, the conversation with the barman was pretty basic. But then I played again and had the curiosity to read every books and articles my character came across for a better understanding of the game world. And what happened? I found out I have unlocked much more conversation options and it deepened the conversation with a fucking barman who had no relevance to the plot. It may not have an influence in the overall plot but it was pretty cool. Of cource, Fallout went the extra mile and made it so that your conversation options ARE determined by your attributes (Charisma and Intelligence helps) and your Speech level.. Back to Deus EX, the fates of your brother and the chopper pilot are actually determined by your actions in game. My first playthrough had both of them dead. However, in my second one, I was well determined to find a way to save them both. I did, and it was cool. It just required careful planning in your action for the first, and curiosity for the second. Back again to Fallout, you can finish the final boss without fighting! I don't think it had been done before in the computer and console RPG genre. You may think, "Oh wow, big fucking deal.", but you when think about it, it doesn't go against the character of those who made the Vault Dweller a diplomat and smooth-talker. In the end, Bob and Joe may have small and subtle differences over how they finished Deus EX. And as for Fallout (I am talking about the first Fallout, to avoid all misunderstanding), Joe and Bob may have vast differences between their own Vault Dwellers. More differences than Joe and Bob's Cloud can hope to have. Let's talk a bit about the pen & paper rpgs: As for the number crunching in D&D, the system is in part at fault, as well as the players and the gamemasters. I think that's the reason why White Wolf came up with that light game system in Vampire the Masquerade. However, splatbooks had to be written to cater to the numbers crunchers who does play Vampire. To be honest, the hardest game to play and the most minimalist in term of rules have to be Amber. And say what you want, be all defensive for all I care, but you will never seize what the article guy was trying to say and getting at UNLESS you have actually played pen & paper RPGs, and different games (Dungeons & dragons, Vampire the Masquerade, Star Wars, Shadowrun, Call of Cthuluh, Legend of the Five Rings, and those are the most played in the hobby), months after months and years after years, with different gamemasters. Last edited by Sheba; 2010-05-15 at 05:23. Reason: More about Fallout |
2010-05-15, 08:37 | Link #127 |
Bishoujo Game Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 38
|
The term "RPG" when applied to video games, as others have said, is now devoid of meaning, and that's why the article is silly. It's looking at the term, analyzing it, and then ranting about why the games we term "RPG" aren't RPGs. That's the gist of it.
We all know they're not digital D&D campaigns.
__________________
|
2010-05-15, 21:42 | Link #131 |
Disabled By Request
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
This is becoming ridiculous.
An RPG isn't determined by that kind of thing, it isn't restricted to that only. An rpg can lack an inventory system AND a leveling system, and still be able to come off as a RPG. If that is what it's called by the creator's, then you are 1) Arguing with the game designers, losing war 2) Trying to make a moot point by trying to prove them wrong. An rpg can be old fashioned or an entirely new game. The elements are important, but the setting is too. Or am I entirely off base? |
2010-05-27, 15:26 | Link #133 |
Augumented Paranoia
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Well there was SMT: Digital Devil Saga. But the major difference between WRPGs and JRPGs is that WRPGs are pretty pessemistic and gritty in terms of their Magnum Opus games. The best in the series are also the darkest, not to rag on JRPGs being unable to make a dark RPG as Nocturne and anything by Cavia is quite along the veins of WRPGs bleak storylines
__________________
|
2010-05-27, 22:28 | Link #136 |
Augumented Paranoia
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
It is much bleaker then most JRPGs, Dragon Age is basically Bioware's response to Planescape Torment with its extremely dark storyline, KOTOR2 was generally bleak in nature with most of the storyline taking place in rather crapsack locations, Fallout is self explanatory. And that's not mentioning Warhammer series (Both of them)
__________________
|
|
|