2010-06-20, 22:59 | Link #2141 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Quote:
I'll go find it later, I need to get some work done right now. And he had to do it this way, rather than do it with just Beatrice, because he needed to kill Erika at the same time. And of course, Bernkastel would totally ruin his plan if he hadn't done it this way. Plus, Beato might not have had the same sense of urgency without Bern and Lambda talking about how screwed he was, believing he was dead. |
|
2010-06-20, 23:25 | Link #2142 | ||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
Come on, do you really want to think Battler is that dumb?
__________________
|
||
2010-06-20, 23:35 | Link #2143 | |
Dea ex Kakera
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sea of Fragments
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-06-20, 23:55 | Link #2144 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Quote:
...though that other part is definitely true. In other words... What if Kanon was the one to seal the two rooms' doors, and Jessica sealed the cousins' room's window? |
|
2010-06-21, 01:51 | Link #2145 | |
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
There is no way Erika could have physically sealed anything, and indeed, there's no red that explicitly states she did. Just constant references to "Erika's seals", without any red confirmation as to what they were. ...Of course, there is something that could undermine my argument, and it's that Eva's seals are the same type as <Miss> Erika's, and if Erika's seals don't exist, why is Eva specifically stated to be sealing the servant's room? Last edited by Tyabann; 2010-06-21 at 04:21. |
|
2010-06-21, 02:38 | Link #2146 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Quote:
Eva's seal was of the same type as <Miss> Erika's. That is because this method of sealing was one that <Miss> Erika and Eva conceived of together after DINNER. It is impossible to tear off any of the seals by any method without leaving marks. There were no suspicious marks on any of the seals...! All of Erika and Eva's seals were not tampered with in any way that hindered their ability to act as seals, such as being scraped off. Those are pretty much physical characteristics...so I dunno how those reds could apply to a meta construct. Though the "Erika alone didn't apply them" explanation still works. |
|
2010-06-21, 04:55 | Link #2147 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
Suppose we're in the Erika-doesn't-exist camp, (well, I am, I should say) and claim that Piece-known-as-Erika-in-red and Meta-Erika are distinct entities, not joined at the hip like the other piece-meta pairs. Red seems to support this decently well because they're distinctly referred by different name formats. Meta-Erika is then able to use the meta-concept of a sealed room as a special ability move against the Gamemaster, which can be used a limited number of times, and does not require the physical seal to exist, while physical seals made by Eva exist and possibly, physical seals made by Piece-known-as-Erika also exist in some cases of Meta-Erika sealing the rooms, but not necessarily. The red about Erika's seals being untampered with and having no suspicious marks is trivial to defuse, because something that doesn't exist physically cannot be tampered with anyway. It is similarly impossible to remove a meta-seal physically, as a physical seal doesn't exist. Seals can still be of the same type if one of them exists and the other doesn't. But that chunk of red also seems to state that the Piece-known-as-Erika actually colluded with Eva about the idea of sealing rooms. Eva is the originator of sealing idea in the first place all the way back in episode 1, and duct tape is just a foolproof version of the same, so that's nothing particularly new. Eva getting someone else to help her with sealing or inventing a more foolproof sealing method also feels slightly normal. (Considering that using a piece of paper with an official stamp on it glued to the door and the door frame is standard sealing practice for police and other officials around my part of the world, it's hardly even an invention, anyone could have picked up the idea somewhere even if they can't think of it themselves.) It works up until we remember that our only candidate for the Piece-known-as-Erika that remains is Shannon, whom Eva never trusted to any serious degree in any game. Shannon and Eva conceiving of something together is a problem, because Eva trusting Shannon with something like that would be quite out of character... ...unless Eva wanted to achieve something else in this manner, maybe.
__________________
|
|
2010-06-21, 05:32 | Link #2148 | |
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-06-21, 08:48 | Link #2149 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Quote:
For the servants, I'm sure Kanon would love to do something like this to her, considering how much he appears to hate her. Shannon, after some convincing, might come onboard, considering how much she gets bullied. Genji and Nanjo would be tricky though, as Nanjo doesn't really have a reason to do it, and Genji is the "responsible and devoted butler" of the family. Still, excluding Nanjo, it wouldn't be that difficult to get the servants onboard. Battler can just order them with the power of the head. |
|
2010-06-21, 14:17 | Link #2150 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Unless he's secretly Genius Gohda.
__________________
|
|
2010-06-21, 15:38 | Link #2152 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
More of a "Magical Gohda Chef" corruption thing, combined with a really bad pun (sound it out).
But actually, if anyone's going to turn out to be a cop, it'd be Gohda. Nanjo has too many ties to people, but Gohda? He doesn't even have family. His behavior is totally out of keeping for a cop though. An actual policeman would never allow himself to be locked in a shed. Unless he's just a really bad cop. Who happens to be a really good cook.
__________________
|
2010-06-21, 16:45 | Link #2154 | |
Maelstorm-Fenrir
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-06-21, 17:00 | Link #2155 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
"We survived! What a miracle!" "Yes, and now you're all under arrest for embezzlement, conspiracy, fraud, blackmail, assault, and child abuse!" "Damn you, Inspector Gohda!"
__________________
|
|
2010-06-23, 08:11 | Link #2157 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
You know I think the main problem is that I have more problems with dumb villains than with dumb heroes. A dumb hero can work, a dumb villain just sucks... unless it's a comedy.
And it is even more true when the hero was stated to be incompetent and the villain is supposed to be extremely intelligent. With the kind of development you are suggesting we have not only a completely clueless Erika, but also a completely clueless Bernkastel.
__________________
|
2010-06-23, 08:45 | Link #2158 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
But even if Bern weren't fooled, she might leave Erika out to dry. She's already shown herself to be quite unfond of Erika, and she likes to torment her almost as much as her enemies. So Erika herself being completely fooled is no problem for me; she is overconfident and has been from the moment she appeared, so thinking she's won is fine. Whether Bern thinks the same doesn't really matter, and if Bern is the GM of ep7, it would seem that she caught on to something going on. She just chose not to bring it up, because she's a jerk. And we can't prove Lambda wouldn't have just let it happen even if she did know, as it seems like the sort of thing she likes doing to mess with Bern. In ep5 it was fairly clear she was not always operating in concert with Bern, and they've always avowed themselves to be enemies. Basically, I don't see why anyone fooled by this is fooled because they're stupid. Erika falls to hubris, the witches don't realize what Battler is up to (or do and want to see if it works, because it's interesting), his allies may or may not know but won't say for Beatrice's sake, and Featherinne may have suspected it all along (or, uh, wrote it, depending). The only person who absolutely must be stupid is Battler if Genius Battler isn't true. Everyone else can come out of it fooled but not foolish.
__________________
|
|
2010-06-23, 14:03 | Link #2159 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Why? I don't really get how can that be different.
It's either that the GM is omniscent on what happens in the gameboard or he isn't omniscent. If it's omniscent, then Bern and Erika are stupid or clueless for not knowing a basic rule of the game. Not to mention Dlanor who always seemed to know how the game works should be clueless as well on this part. You can't explain this with "pride". If you base your strategy on a false premise you are simply totally clueless. If you don't know something about the battlefield, you don't "suppose" something and create your strategy on that assumption. I think that should be on strategy 101. And you can't even say it's Battler's great deceit, because he's not the one who made the rules of this game. If Erika thought she could do stuff under the gamemaster's nose while everyone with a brain would think it's not possible then you can only say Erika is dumb. And if the GM is not omniscent, then it's actually not the GM's fault. I mean I suppose that Battler knows he's not omniscent (in fact it's not like he shows he find it strange that Erika can do things under his nose), then why is he dumb? What can he do about that? And if you say he's dumb because he let Erika get the seals, yeah he was dumb, but then... this time it is overconfidence, and that's not me who says this, Dlanor says it.
__________________
|
2010-06-23, 15:07 | Link #2160 | ||||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Gross pride and cocksure overconfidence are out of character for Battler. He is confident, and he talks a big game, but he has always been easy to frustrate and fluster and he has always acknowledged when he is in a bad situation or losing. You ask me to either believe that: 1) Battler was both acting grossly out of character and fundamentally mistaken about some critically important detail related to the truth and GMing the game that he made a ridiculous mistake, in direct contradiction with what we've been told about his enlightenment at the end of ep5. OR 2) No matter what Battler knows or does, he bungles everything, because he's stupid and his character exists to screw up, which is bad writing. OR 3) Battler had an ulterior motive for his behavior, or a risk which was worth either potentially being entrapped by Erika or actually being entrapped by Erika. It's not hard for me to know which one I would prefer be true.
__________________
|
||||
|
|