2013-03-26, 17:11 | Link #62 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
I stopped giving ANN page views years ago and I highly recommend avoiding it unless there's no other choice. They make money off of page views - there's a natural tendency to publish bullshit and controversy just to get the rage going.
__________________
|
2013-03-30, 19:25 | Link #68 |
osananajimi
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Midwest USA
|
Kawaii as a word and a concept seems to have been around longer, and has some kind of meaning in general Japanese culture outside fandom.
I remember coming across a list of 8 or 10 traits that made something kawaii. From that, and concrete examples, I think an exact equality between, say, US notions of cute, and Japanese notions of kawaii doesn't really work, but there's enough overlap for it to pass as a translation. "Moe" doesn't have an English analog that leaps to mind, and I'm not always sure what people mean by it, either, but it's been in conversation more lately.
__________________
|
2013-03-30, 20:20 | Link #69 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
"kawaii" you will find in any standard japanese dictionary. Official word, long standing, used by general populace of Japan.
"moe" is a slang term, used almost only by the anime fandom in Japan (otaku + casual fans). It is a slang term, not used by Average Japanese People.
__________________
|
2013-03-30, 20:42 | Link #70 | |
Senior Member
Author
|
Quote:
At least to English ears. That's usually how the two terms sound to me when I've heard other people say them.
__________________
|
|
2013-03-30, 20:49 | Link #71 | |
We're Back
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Redgrave City
Age: 35
|
Quote:
But anyway, who cares about what English speakers think ?
__________________
|
|
2013-03-30, 20:53 | Link #72 | ||
Senior Member
Author
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2013-03-31, 23:42 | Link #75 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
...and with that, I think we'll close. There have been some pretty good definitions given that clearly explain the difference between the two terms. Moral of the story is basically that just because two words can be used, in some contexts, to describe the same thing, doesn't mean that the two words actually have the same (or even a similar) definition.
If there's a good reason to re-open the thread, please feel free to contact any member of the staff.
__________________
|
|
|