AnimeSuki Forums

DjDeluxay · 2004-02-03, 12:42

I know its two days past the performance which revealed the breast of one Janet Jackson.
but what are your thoughts on it?
Can i post the picture?

I was pretty happy with that. It didn't bug me that we saw her breast. She has shown it before. and she got down and dirty on her last concert tour in Hawaii

Hunter · 2004-02-03, 13:09

Frankly all this story is ridiculous.
One can barely see a part of her breast during what? 2 seconds maybe? And people act as if it was an awful and sooo important matter.

Kill this sinner! She perverts our poor children!

I mean can you imagine the result of the vision of a breast on the weak mind of a young? He might become a moob later you know!
Or even worst, disgusted by this horrible piercing, he will become... Gay

Maybe we should veiled our wives and daughters like the Taliban hmmm?
With a netting for the eyes that would be so fashion.

Shii · 2004-02-03, 13:20

Totally unsuitable for television. We shouldn't be introducing kids to such a thing when many parents in this country are devout Christians and therefore have a taboo against it. Parents should be able to make their own decisions on what to show their kids.

I personally don't have a problem with it, but I sympathize with those who were shocked. This shouldn't have happened during the Super Bowl.

Evan · 2004-02-03, 13:30

I have been to many forums and all have this thread.And to me,justin did it on purpose,kind of adding more stir to the jackson's family,

cause that is the bottom line!

dragonz20 · 2004-02-03, 13:48

I didn't mind it but I am not a parent or a little child. I don't think it's appropriate for primetime television. It's blown a bit out of proportion and I think Janet and Justin didn't mean to do it on purpose but it was a huge accident. It's just shocking, especially to the families out there. If I had little kids, I'd be pretty peeved. But I don't...

Superchop · 2004-02-03, 13:55

I dont find it that big of a deal, the camera wasn't focused on the bare breast...even if it was done on porpuse (which i kind of think it was...just by the way justin ripped it off and actually held on to it) havent kids seen worse on tv shows? a lot of tv shows nowadays have people saying bitch all over the place...and have women walking around with their cleavage showing...so showing 1 breast that's barely noticable isn't that bad...

Go to other countries...some of them have women walking around naked in the commercials...and some tv shows have people getting naked to win whatever the prize is...besides...all little kids are perverts..and if they didn't see it on tv, then they would have somewhere else...(friends house looking at mag's, internet porn etc etc...) the parents should at least be happy that they knew what their kids saw and why they saw it.

Shii · 2004-02-03, 15:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superchop

Go to other countries...

This isn't "other countries", it's the United States. And the Super Bowl isn't one of the "a lot of tv shows nowadays", it is not supposed to be graphic or obscene at all.

If your statement is at all true, and what's good for other countries is good for us, I guess we'll be seeing that Anabukin-chan commercial on national television soon.

OFFSPRiNGCo16 · 2004-02-03, 15:21

Lol it was dumb and you couldnt really see anything anyhow. I mean, I do believe that it shouldnt have happened but it wasnt the end of the world. Heck, compared to other tv shows etc...that was nothing....(and a lot of my friends seemed to enjoy that little slip up

)

daliinn · 2004-02-03, 15:34

Its not really that big of a deal, its not like they meant for her breast to pop out. Its live television, what are you gunna do? Plus who hasn't seen a little boob before. There wasn't even enough footage to make it enjoyable.

This is really no different than when Cher said F*** live at the VMAs. Live telesision is unpredictable.

Shii · 2004-02-03, 15:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by daliinn

Its not really that big of a deal, its not like they meant for her breast to pop out.

First off, Drudge alleges the whole thing was planned by CBS executives. Even Jackson admitted that there were plans for it, although she said they were made after the final rehearsal.

Secondly, the entire show was just as terrible and just as unsuitable for nationally broadcasted television:

Superchop · 2004-02-03, 15:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashibaka

This isn't "other countries", it's the United States. And the Super Bowl isn't one of the "a lot of tv shows nowadays", it is not supposed to be graphic or obscene at all.

If your statement is at all true, and what's good for other countries is good for us, I guess we'll be seeing that Anabukin-chan commercial on national television soon.

Hmm...you enjoy seeing people tackling each other, jumping on top of each other and sometimes watch players get seriously injured getting carried out on stretchers, seeing them bleed and you don't think that's graphic?

Now i'm not saying it was a good thing that she popped out her breast...and i never said taht what's good for other countries is good for this one, i was just saying that it's not that big a deal that her breast popped out...and that other places are worse in these type of things but they don't flip out like i see many people doing...ok i agree that it was stupid and it never should of happenned but it did...there's nothing we can do about it...and as for the little kids...if they're old enough to know what it is...then i'm certain that they must of seen those type of things elsewhere...

method · 2004-02-03, 15:59

Well the FCC is not pleased with the acts as whole from some of the reports circulating on the internet. I did see anything overly excessive by the performances other than Janet's boob, but I'm not a parent either.

dragonz20 · 2004-02-03, 16:13

Like I said, blown out of proportion. Besides the bare breast, there wasn't anything that couldn't be seen on MTV or BET. Dances were pretty tame compared to what u can see on some music videos. Still, a bare breast is a bare breast and that just shouldn't be allowed on national primetime television in the US.

Vulkar · 2004-02-03, 16:19

Frankly, I think this whole incident is a bad thing. The whole point of tv ratings, etc. are so parents can monitor what kind of content their families and children encounter while viewing television. I have no problem with Janet Jackson exposing her breasts provided it is done in the appropriate place. That's what cable channels such as HBO/Cinemax and other high number channels are for. CBS or other networks broadcast over the air are not appropriate for sexualized content since they are federally required to not show it.

SwiftStar · 2004-02-03, 16:47

I really didnt think it was all that terrible. It was afterall just a breast. Something we have all suckled on at one point in our lives. Why is it now such a demonic thing that will corrupt our children?

PiGGiEE · 2004-02-03, 16:49

Gahhhhh! I watched the whole SuperBowl but half-time! Rawwwrrrr! Oh well... I don't really need to see Janet Jackson's boob anyways. It wouldn't have bothered me... but yeah it is inappropriate... especially during the SuperBowl when there are kids that could be watching with their families... Everyone is telling me that... "Justin is DA MAN!"... I'm sure you guys didn't mind though

Tzurial · 2004-02-03, 17:07

I dont see why people think breasts are so inappropriate. A while ago a women wrote an article in the opinion section of the newspaper complaining about mothers breastfeeding their kids in public. People seem to think of breasts as sexual objects, which theyre not. Its a nipple with a mammary gland behind it, I really dont think people should be this shocked

acefighter · 2004-02-03, 17:16

Totally unsuitable for television. We shouldn't be introducing kids to such a thing when many parents in this country are devout Christians and therefore have a taboo against it. Parents should be able to make their own decisions on what to show their kids.

I personally don't have a problem with it, but I sympathize with those who were shocked. This shouldn't have happened during the Super Bowl
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

i say fvck to these people. who the hell gives a dam. thier gonna see it sooner or later. better seen

p3psi · 2004-02-03, 17:45

I think timberlake got punk'd! by that ashton kuckie guy, i think i saw em on that show before.

also, who says they have to have a musical act for every SB fking half time show, break out the B&B circus or something.

Shiori · 2004-02-03, 17:58

It's understandable that this has outraged many people due to social taboos and all, but I think it's all overly hyped... well the boob exposure was at least.

It was pretty vulgur of Justine to be groping Janets breast on live television. That would be the only thing I was slightly disgusted by.

2004-02-03, 12:42	Link #1
DjDeluxay マイクスズカゼ、ウェチノ Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: SEattle,WA	Super Bowl's performance. I know its two days past the performance which revealed the breast of one Janet Jackson. but what are your thoughts on it? Can i post the picture? I was pretty happy with that. It didn't bug me that we saw her breast. She has shown it before. and she got down and dirty on her last concert tour in Hawaii

2004-02-03, 13:20	Link #3
Shii Afflicted by the vanities Fansubber Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Fish-shape Paumanok Age: 36	Totally unsuitable for television. We shouldn't be introducing kids to such a thing when many parents in this country are devout Christians and therefore have a taboo against it. Parents should be able to make their own decisions on what to show their kids. I personally don't have a problem with it, but I sympathize with those who were shocked. This shouldn't have happened during the Super Bowl. __________________ Learn to define and spell moé Shii (formerly known as ashibaka)

2004-02-03, 13:09	Link #2
Hunter Bubbly and super fun Join Date: May 2003 Location: Doesn't look like Kansas	Frankly all this story is ridiculous. One can barely see a part of her breast during what? 2 seconds maybe? And people act as if it was an awful and sooo important matter. Kill this sinner! She perverts our poor children! I mean can you imagine the result of the vision of a breast on the weak mind of a young? He might become a moob later you know! Or even worst, disgusted by this horrible piercing, he will become... Gay Maybe we should veiled our wives and daughters like the Taliban hmmm? With a netting for the eyes that would be so fashion.

2004-02-03, 13:30	Link #4
Evan 天使我爱你 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: With My Hime Natsuki-sama	I have been to many forums and all have this thread.And to me,justin did it on purpose,kind of adding more stir to the jackson's family, cause that is the bottom line!

2004-02-03, 13:48	Link #5
dragonz20 Cantonese Dimples Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: North Jersey (near NY city) Age: 46	I didn't mind it but I am not a parent or a little child. I don't think it's appropriate for primetime television. It's blown a bit out of proportion and I think Janet and Justin didn't mean to do it on purpose but it was a huge accident. It's just shocking, especially to the families out there. If I had little kids, I'd be pretty peeved. But I don't...

2004-02-03, 13:55	Link #6
Superchop Lord Sesshoumaru Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: "Post a Photo of Yourself!" Thread	I dont find it that big of a deal, the camera wasn't focused on the bare breast...even if it was done on porpuse (which i kind of think it was...just by the way justin ripped it off and actually held on to it) havent kids seen worse on tv shows? a lot of tv shows nowadays have people saying bitch all over the place...and have women walking around with their cleavage showing...so showing 1 breast that's barely noticable isn't that bad... Go to other countries...some of them have women walking around naked in the commercials...and some tv shows have people getting naked to win whatever the prize is...besides...all little kids are perverts..and if they didn't see it on tv, then they would have somewhere else...(friends house looking at mag's, internet porn etc etc...) the parents should at least be happy that they knew what their kids saw and why they saw it.

2004-02-03, 15:21	Link #8
OFFSPRiNGCo16 Godlike Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Long Island New York Age: 37	Lol it was dumb and you couldnt really see anything anyhow. I mean, I do believe that it shouldnt have happened but it wasnt the end of the world. Heck, compared to other tv shows etc...that was nothing....(and a lot of my friends seemed to enjoy that little slip up )

2004-02-03, 15:34	Link #9
daliinn Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Age: 35	Its not really that big of a deal, its not like they meant for her breast to pop out. Its live television, what are you gunna do? Plus who hasn't seen a little boob before. There wasn't even enough footage to make it enjoyable. This is really no different than when Cher said F*** live at the VMAs. Live telesision is unpredictable.

2004-02-03, 15:59	Link #12
method Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2003	Well the FCC is not pleased with the acts as whole from some of the reports circulating on the internet. I did see anything overly excessive by the performances other than Janet's boob, but I'm not a parent either.

2004-02-03, 16:13	Link #13
dragonz20 Cantonese Dimples Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: North Jersey (near NY city) Age: 46	Like I said, blown out of proportion. Besides the bare breast, there wasn't anything that couldn't be seen on MTV or BET. Dances were pretty tame compared to what u can see on some music videos. Still, a bare breast is a bare breast and that just shouldn't be allowed on national primetime television in the US.

2004-02-03, 16:19	Link #14
Vulkar Lost in Time and Space Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Burlington, VT USA Age: 40	Frankly, I think this whole incident is a bad thing. The whole point of tv ratings, etc. are so parents can monitor what kind of content their families and children encounter while viewing television. I have no problem with Janet Jackson exposing her breasts provided it is done in the appropriate place. That's what cable channels such as HBO/Cinemax and other high number channels are for. CBS or other networks broadcast over the air are not appropriate for sexualized content since they are federally required to not show it.

2004-02-03, 16:47	Link #15
SwiftStar Daydreamer Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Brooklyn	I really didnt think it was all that terrible. It was afterall just a breast. Something we have all suckled on at one point in our lives. Why is it now such a demonic thing that will corrupt our children?

2004-02-03, 16:49	Link #16
PiGGiEE PiGGiEE Judo Chop Chop! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Funny Farm	Gahhhhh! I watched the whole SuperBowl but half-time! Rawwwrrrr! Oh well... I don't really need to see Janet Jackson's boob anyways. It wouldn't have bothered me... but yeah it is inappropriate... especially during the SuperBowl when there are kids that could be watching with their families... Everyone is telling me that... "Justin is DA MAN!"... I'm sure you guys didn't mind though

2004-02-03, 17:07	Link #17
Tzurial in silent opposition Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: oh...I've been there	I dont see why people think breasts are so inappropriate. A while ago a women wrote an article in the opinion section of the newspaper complaining about mothers breastfeeding their kids in public. People seem to think of breasts as sexual objects, which theyre not. Its a nipple with a mammary gland behind it, I really dont think people should be this shocked

2004-02-03, 17:16	Link #18
acefighter Banned Join Date: Dec 2003	Totally unsuitable for television. We shouldn't be introducing kids to such a thing when many parents in this country are devout Christians and therefore have a taboo against it. Parents should be able to make their own decisions on what to show their kids. I personally don't have a problem with it, but I sympathize with those who were shocked. This shouldn't have happened during the Super Bowl ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// i say fvck to these people. who the hell gives a dam. thier gonna see it sooner or later. better seen

2004-02-03, 17:45	Link #19
p3psi Oscar winning black actor Join Date: Nov 2003	I think timberlake got punk'd! by that ashton kuckie guy, i think i saw em on that show before. also, who says they have to have a musical act for every SB fking half time show, break out the B&B circus or something.

2004-02-03, 17:58	Link #20
Shiori Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Australia Age: 40	It's understandable that this has outraged many people due to social taboos and all, but I think it's all overly hyped... well the boob exposure was at least. It was pretty vulgur of Justine to be groping Janets breast on live television. That would be the only thing I was slightly disgusted by.