2010-07-30, 11:43 | Link #14861 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Quote:
And besides, a Logic Error doesn't arise two red contradict each other. If you tried that, you'd probably just choke on the second. A Logic Error arises when you can't provide a reasonable explanation on how something shown or said was done by magic can be done using human capabilities. |
|
2010-07-30, 11:46 | Link #14862 |
do you know ベアトリーチェ様?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 35
|
Well, it's clear that the red only has to apply to the game it refers to, and that there are common elements between games. If you want to divide them up, that's one way to look at it, just that they aren't intrinsically different--it's a consequence of the way the game is set up.
If you're playing chess, you could say statements like "the queen is worth 9 points" or "your queen has been captured" and (provided the latter is true) they're both facts, although one is a rule of the game. Although under the theory I posted that gold text can't be disproved using any means on the board, gold text would always refer to the rules of the game and not its current setup. |
2010-07-30, 11:48 | Link #14863 |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
I was thinking of the followings...
Arc 5 heavily went into the idea that Beatrice is not the culprit, arc 6 seems to push that idea even further. In arc 4 Beato claims that Battler's sin is not between Battler and Beato. She claims because of his sin one person dies, and later everyone dies. She also claims his sin is not related to his close family. Putting these things together it feels like Battler's sin is related to the real culprit who isn't Beato. Tho taking things into context again, the only time Beato ever said in red that she killed anyone is Battler in arc 4's end which seems to suggest that that explosion is no accident and is for some reason or another the will of Beato herself. So it sorta suggest that culprit starts killing and Beato makes everything blows up as some sort of yet unexplained consequence. |
2010-07-30, 11:51 | Link #14864 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-07-30, 12:16 | Link #14865 |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Just thought of an interesting fact.
While all furniture seems to reject having an interest in the gold or solving the epitaph, Kanon was convinced by Kinzo to try to solve it. He's the only servant whom we've been told tried to solved it, and he did so from a "this is an order" perspective if we believe what we're shown. Of course we're not shown that he actually did try to solve it, but if he did solve it it makes sense that it wouldn't be shown. |
2010-07-30, 13:01 | Link #14866 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In the Meta- World... on Virgillia's bed.
|
Quote:
Like Virgilia is Beatice's former master, it would make sense if in reality she was a source of education for Beatrice. Ronove would've been a fellow servant along with the seven stakes who were probably seven other servants who were either as they appear or older. Bern and Lambda are probably some friends of Beatrice, as in Takano and The Furude family probably had connections to the Ushiromiya family. This is just an idea, but its actually quite fun to think about. |
|
2010-07-30, 13:13 | Link #14867 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Quote:
- Why bring Kuwadorian and the second Beatrice up? "Sayo" has her own backstory that doesn't seem to tie in to either of those aspects. And the second Beatrice HAS to be important, because there's absolutely no point to her being there otherwise. If all you need is an abandoned house secluded somewhere on the island, all you need is to have the original Beatrice dead and Kuwadorian abandoned in the loss of its first mistress. Actually, sorry for the tangent, but I'm going to go into this a little more. Kinzo attempting to recreate Beatrice is a pretty steady plot point. We know for sure he did it at least once. (Episode 5 implies that he tried it again, with Natsuhi's adopted baby.) The weird thing is, what made him stop? He didn't particularly seem upset over the death of the child entrusted to Natsuhi. He just laughed and said something about escaping the cage of flesh again. But when we see him shortly before his death, he's wailing for Beatrice to come back. If the guy is nuts enough to believe he's transporting the soul of his dead mistress into other people's bodies, what's stopping him from doing it again before he dies? If Sayo is the host and she somehow managed to exorcise Beatrice from her body, I don't get why Kinzo isn't bugging her more about it. We don't see him treat her in any special way. Whereas Battler in EP6--who is obviously supposed to mirror Kinzo, right down to the "theme music"--absolutely flips whenever he sees Moeto because she's "Beatrice" but she doesn't act correctly. Even Beatrice v2.0. When we see Kinzo talking to her, he keeps on trying to convince her that she's Beatrice. But he never pays any special attention to Shannon or Kanon. No wild accusations of "hiding" Beatrice from him. No insistence that they "remember" something. Nothing that would ping me as Kinzo recognizing they have a connection to Beatrice--which is odd when he's So. Fucking. Obsessed. with seeing her "one last time". Let me put it this way. Even if you accept that Kinzo sees Shannon, Kanon, and Beatrice as completely separate beings, he would still have to recognize that they're "related". And if the woman he's in love with suddenly vanishes, of course he's going to be bugging her "brother" and "sister" as to where the hell she is.
__________________
|
||
2010-07-30, 13:24 | Link #14868 |
Senior Member
|
I mentioned this a few days ago, but nobody noticed:
There are a few points where Beatrice's heart is mentioned: - Beatrice says she will reveal her heart to defeat Evatrice in Episode 3 - Beatrice mentions her heart when she's posing the final riddle in Episode 4 - Lambdadelta mentions Beatrice's heart wrt. escaping the logic error in Episode 6. (I'm fairly sure there were some other places, but I can't remember any offhand.) I think each of these corresponds to one of the rules X, Y, Z. So one of the rules corresponds to Shkannon and another corresponds to the bomb. I'm not sure if either of those can explain Nanjo's murder (maybe the extended Shkannon rule could). The Shkannon rule might be something more general about how a person can have different sides to themselves (that is, in the sense of an actor who's playing multiple roles than DID). It's certainly been mentioned all over the place: Maria assuming the identity of a witch to extend her experience and Hideyoshi's fake accent in Episode 1; George's behavior at the aquarium and Jessie-sama in Episode 2; Evatrice and Jessica's possible DID in Episode 3; Eva's behavior being different off-island in Episode 4. (The Episode 3 Jessica is particularly important. Battler suggests that another personality of Jessica killed Nanjo; Evatrice's response was not along the lines of "Actions by one personality count as being performed by any personality.", but one specific to the case of Jessica against Eva. I consider that acknowledgment that multiple personalities for a single body can be considered distinct to the red text.) Also, the bomb was apparently set to go off at Oct 5 at 11:59 PM. Without the typhoon, most of the family would have left before it went off. Maybe Manon or Renon was paid to set the bomb before leaving the island.
__________________
|
2010-07-30, 13:36 | Link #14869 | |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
I'm even more sure that this is the way Beatrice intended it to be by the fact there seem to be a letter for each "sender" and not a letter for each "receiver". In fact Ange has found a single letter with her name as the sender, but there is no letter addressed to Battler and no letter addressed to Kyrie. If they existed Ange would have received them too, at the very least Battler's letter would, since he has no other relative alive.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-30, 14:02 | Link #14870 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
Like EP3 where Virgilia 'awakened' of Kumasawa, or the clue that Genji was created by Kinzo with the help of Ronove. Also, Ronoue <-> Ronove. And finally the answers in EP6 where Battler just sees them as Kumasawa and Genji. But then when Kumasawa took Moetrice to Featherine's library, she turned into Virgilia. Anyways, even if it's not Beatrice-1967, there are enough clues that someone (or perhaps some line of people) is picking up stories from family members and friends and injecting them into the story. Siesta Sisters <-> Rabbits figures for example... Quote:
Also from how Eva-Beatrice appeared to be attacking but could not destroy Beatrice's heart. |
||
2010-07-30, 14:48 | Link #14871 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In the Meta- World... on Virgillia's bed.
|
Quote:
"... The Core of the Witch Beatrice." "... the existence of the Witch Beatrice." So the rules apply directly to Beatrice. However, I do have a vague idea for these rules. Like for Rule X, this deals with something that Bernkastel personally went through, and the reason why she can't win this game. Even though she has gone through this trial before, there are still obstacles that prevents her from winning this game. Rule Y is something that we've already been introduced to and is the reason why Beatrice is Beatrice for she wouldn't have existed if it wasn't for this reason. Rule Z is what makes Beatrice a witch, its what gives her power as an alchemist and entitles her as the Golden Witch. Alchemy is the understanding, deconstructing, and reconstructing of matter. Its magic and science, a combination of both. I have an idea on what it is, too. But again, I'm not sure on it. |
|
2010-07-30, 16:03 | Link #14872 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
So this is supposedly the back cover of Umineko EP7:
http://ameblo.jp/naruse-t/image-1060...666792286.html Nothing we haven't really seen before... except that phrase... oh and obviously, spoilers for EP7. 8) |
2010-07-30, 16:07 | Link #14873 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Judoh's George culprit analysis
So I guess I'm going to put together my George culprit theory now. I'm not going to spend my time on the how for the murders because getting around the red and explaining things away is pretty easy (and something Battler says in game 5 [1] gives me an excuse to not worry about it) So I'm going to focus on hints that make him capable of being the culprit as a narrative and a person instead. So rather than a theory to get around the red think of this as a character analysis.
The first part is George's interest in the occult/magic. Spoiler for space:
The second is George is the only person explicitly shown to be capable of Familicide. Spoiler for space:
Third he has tons of motive. Spoiler for space:
So these are my 31 pieces of evidence suggesting the George is the culprit NEW EVIDENCE APPEARS. According to a reliable, source, GEORGE STEALS CANDY FROM KIDS! [32]
__________________
Last edited by Judoh; 2012-06-15 at 09:52. |
2010-07-30, 16:19 | Link #14874 |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Very nicely put, Judoh.
Minor eureka moment: A Jessitrice has the perfect motive to cover for the culprit if she thinks Shannon(trice) is the culprit while George actually is.
__________________
|
2010-07-30, 16:21 | Link #14875 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffer overflow
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-07-30, 16:51 | Link #14876 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-07-30, 16:56 | Link #14877 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
With the meta world stuff in the background it looks like the Guy in blue is definitely a meta world character....
If he's not Van Dine I'm betting he's the 45th demon Vine. Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-07-30, 17:01 | Link #14879 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Wow Judoh... wow. Even if someone doesn't agree with you on George being the culprit, anyone's got to give you credit for all this work, marking your evidence and organizing it very well.
It's also excellent support for the George Culprit Theory. I love it. Quote:
I'm just going by Ryuukishi's tradition and expecting the two new characters, which are almost certainly meta-characters, to have western names written in katakana. If someone who can read the text finds something that indicates otherwise, that would be cool though. |
|
2010-07-30, 17:03 | Link #14880 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Quote:
After all, Van Dine. |
|
|
|