2012-03-26, 03:36 | Link #2663 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
People tend to cling to what they want to hear.
Me, I read with a sceptic eyebrow raised until I hit the "new character based on someone who baked cookies for the devs" part. That's when I just rolled my eyes and closed the image. |
2012-03-26, 05:18 | Link #2665 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
They do. Not the content itself, no, but the thought that Bioware planned this. Because it confirms their screams that Bioware is being stupid/greedy/insert prefered accusation here.
It's the whole "See? I was right!" idea that people cling to. |
2012-03-27, 10:04 | Link #2669 |
The Dark Knight
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From the deepest abyss in the world, where you think?
Age: 38
|
I have a feeling that Bioware may end up just adding more stuff to the ending rather than offer alternate versions and such which in the end result would mean jack.
This would probably lead to an even bigger backlash as that's not what people were complaining about. They could probably clarify the starchild (Shepard asking why he looks like the kid you saw died) but I would like to see how they explain, -> Joker running away from the field (with your squadmates) despite Hackett stating firmly that this was an "all in" battle and there was no retreat. -> Nobody knowing what the Crucible actually does but again, "all in" -> Was the entire fleet destoyed since Normandy was affected? -> The fact that the marine was stating that all ground forces were to fall back to the buildings (and ships don't fall back to buildings) -> The fact that the Crucible was already on the way and Hackett specifically stated to protect it at all costs and it was locked in so they couldn't back out. I mean they have a lot of explaining to do. Is it just me or does anybody else find it odd that Bioware is so firm on sticking with its guns? |
2012-03-27, 10:16 | Link #2670 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
PR rule is never admit error if you think you can get away with it. Lines like "artistic integrity" and "you never were suppose to have the final choice because it is realistic" makes me want to punch walls. Bioware sticks to their guns because they don't care. They have your money, and they will have even more money when they charge you a paid DLC you deserved to have for free. You are a wallet to them. Entitled to nothing. Bioware is not so much sticking to their guns as much as don't see the need to explain themselves. Why should they care about pleasing people? It's telling that the official response to the complaints were "The game got 10/10 from review sites! So what's the problem?".
__________________
Last edited by Vallen Chaos Valiant; 2012-03-27 at 10:45. |
|
2012-03-27, 10:55 | Link #2671 |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
It's not like changing a story based on reception is a novel thing. Books have been rewritten since the dawn of their creation, movies receive special editions on an almost constant basis and comic books devote entire series to retconning unpopular endings.
|
2012-03-27, 13:52 | Link #2674 | ||
The Dark Knight
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From the deepest abyss in the world, where you think?
Age: 38
|
Quote:
I mean what do you gain by insulting your readers? That's what gets me. What makes Mass Effect so special that it deserves to be raised as a God by the higher ups? Quote:
On that matter, I hope no one would buy any DLC's except for anything that changes the ending. Like I said, what's the point of buying "Take Omega back" when in the end space travel will be destroyed and you end up starving to death? |
||
2012-03-27, 17:25 | Link #2675 |
dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
|
Theres one thing the ending has ruined most for me and thats re-playability.
I've played through ME1 and ME2 multiply times each and enjoyed each play-through since the endings always played out differently but now after seeing the same utterly awful endings of ME3 I just can't be bothered/motivated enough to play through it again.
__________________
|
2012-03-27, 22:00 | Link #2676 |
Carbon
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Off topic, but..
http://kotaku.com/5896947/the-true-e...street-fighter Broken Steel, FF13-2 DLC ending and this has set a very bad precedent. It gives the sign to developers that's it's okay to sell an incomplete product. As horrible as ME3's ending are, if they patch their ending with a DLC it will pretty much kill the future of storytelling in videogames. And if they put a price tag on it... Oh God.. the horror
__________________
|
2012-03-27, 22:34 | Link #2677 |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
|
If there's a price tag, we'll know the motivation was greed. If it's free, I wonder why they didn't complete the game then release it. Or perhaps considering the scale of the outburst, it would've been for a price but they decide otherwise. I somehow doubt this was originally planned like this, there's no way someone with 1/2 a brain would think this wouldn't get significant backlash from fans. Stupid pills, they were taking them.
__________________
|
2012-03-27, 22:50 | Link #2679 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
No one would mind paying for DLC that explore each alien planet with more detail. But the requirement is that the Ending be altered, as otherwise there is literally no point buying them at all. A Nihilistic ending is all well and good if you deliberately want to kill a franchise, but I am sure Bioware want the opposite of that.
__________________
|
|
Tags |
effect, games, mass |
|
|