2011-07-06, 01:41 | Link #181 |
worshipping the pantyhose
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Manila, Philippines
|
If you guys have not given this a read, in my opinion it's a really good read into how the Michael Bay movies tie together:
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Movie_timeline Of course, those who have not seen #3 yet can simply overlook the end of the page. Though I'm not sure of the officialness of that wiki, it makes a lot of sense. Honestly I found the image captions to be quite hilarious |
2011-07-06, 16:56 | Link #182 |
Know who you are
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Resides within the depths of Ned infested Glasgow
|
Hmm how do I describe Tranformers III.....I think simply put it's a Michael Bay Transformers movie.
Big bangs and big booms, that at least was consistent throught the series First a problem thats been there since the start of the series is it's terrible editing. I think that speaks for itself, couldn't care what anyone says on this matter, it was bad, period. Biggest problem for this 3rd film tho is the Optimus vs Megatron fight was painfully not there. I got that they were making Prime to be one tough son of a bitch from the start but the one epic fight(that we all expected should have been) was simply not there. One time where I can say overkill and not in a nice way. Now about Miss Rosie, I know some commented on why she's in the film and I agree, she's pointless service but I won't hold that agianst her just Bay cause damn, thats one sweet little rear! Just like with Megan Fox all I could say was "oh so I want to have her over the dining table" and well that applies to Miss Rosie as well I don't think I got the enegry to go into the whole "why don't we get to see this Transformer or that Transformer?" I know changing up some Tranformers was gonna happen. Altho I will say the lack of Thundercracker and Skywarp will always be a sore point. In the end I still have this very odd love/hate thing with the series. I hate it for it's obvious flaws/problems and what not, you know the whole destroying of fond childhood memories but at same time love it cause it's simply Transformers and big ass robots going BANG and BOOM. We got stuck with Bay and thats not gonna change so gotta live with it. Now onwards to the next childhood memories to be thrown into a blender without the lid put on!
__________________
|
2011-07-06, 17:49 | Link #183 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
For better or worse, this is Bay's last Transformers film, so whoever is going to reboot it is going give us new things to complain about.
__________________
|
|
2011-07-06, 17:54 | Link #184 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
Actually, the latest rumor was Bay returning since DotM is going to make a fortune, but recasting Jason Statham as the new lead (no, this is not a joke).
Statham is far from a great actor, but he's very charismatic and likeable. I think the best case scenario would be to have him play a character with a Decepticon device attached to his throat which requires him to run around screaming throughout the entire movie or his head explodes. |
2011-07-06, 18:00 | Link #185 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2011-07-06, 19:24 | Link #186 |
Know who you are
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Resides within the depths of Ned infested Glasgow
|
Ehh what a reboot?!
Already?! I take it thats only rumors atm right? Not sure how I'd feel about that tbh but only thing I can say is they would need to keep Peter Cullen and Hugo Weaving as Optimus and Megatron.
__________________
|
2011-07-06, 22:09 | Link #187 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
Hasbro is having a good time selling a variety of movie themed toys. They won't allow the film to end here. Which means there will be a reboot sometime in the next 5 years.
__________________
|
|
2011-07-06, 22:24 | Link #188 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
This is a movie series I wouldn't mind seeing be rebooted immediately since I hate Michael Bay so much. I'm hopeful for Statham getting the lead rule, even if it is only a rumor at this point, while also snatching up a fun and exciting director in the process. Hell, why not go after Joss Whedon once he finished up 'The Avengers'?
|
2011-07-06, 22:30 | Link #189 | |
PolyPerson!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern VA
|
Quote:
Not sure he'd want to tarnish his rep, given how badly the series has been driven into the poop-chute.
__________________
|
|
2011-07-06, 22:32 | Link #190 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
I don't see how that would do anything to his reputation. How does Bay's incompetence as a director reflect upon Whedon in any way? If anything, he could make the first ENJOYABLE Transformers movie, so there could be a lot for him to gain from it.
|
2011-07-06, 22:36 | Link #191 | |
PolyPerson!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern VA
|
Quote:
I don't see it happening, though.
__________________
|
|
2011-07-06, 22:48 | Link #192 |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Transformers had worse days than Bay did the 2nd film. It has a long history of ups and downs, and yet it survives. You are over-estimating Bay's influence, he is just a man. Bay isn't important enough to kill Transformers by a long shot. And as I say, the toys sell well. That's the important part.
__________________
|
2011-07-07, 00:51 | Link #193 |
Senior Guest
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Athens (GMT+2)
Age: 35
|
This movie sucked sooo much...first off, the filler. Spike Sam goes job hunting for what seems like an eternity and spends quality time with his new girlfriend, and my thoughts at the moment were "WTF am I watching!?". Any scene including his girlfriend or her boss could have easily not existed and have no impact whatsoever. Anyways, on to the transformers:
Spoiler for Movie spoilers:
Overall score: 2.5/10 |
2011-07-07, 18:29 | Link #194 | |
Tastes Cloudy
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Snake Way
Age: 35
|
Quote:
Spoiler for Spoilers:
__________________
|
|
2011-07-07, 20:21 | Link #195 | |||||
Sleepy Lurker
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nun'yabiznehz
Age: 38
|
Which was...
Spoiler:
Quote:
Spoiler:
Quote:
Oh, yeah, something that relies on the principle of cosmic irony. Quote:
Spoiler:
Quote:
Spoiler:
Quote:
Spoiler:
__________________
Last edited by Renegade334; 2011-07-08 at 02:36. |
|||||
2011-07-07, 21:34 | Link #197 |
Dictadere~!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: On the front lines, fighting for inderpendence.
|
Well. It took 3 movies to kill Starscream. Finally.
All in all, I got what I payed for. A movie filled with explosions, slo-mo's galore, and giant robots. As a nice bonus, I got the laughs. The osprey drop scene with the flying-squirrels was oddly hilarious. Not to mention Rosies temporary derp in the middle of the carnage. You may have a nice rear, but your lips remind me of a porn star. Not so attractive.
__________________
|
2011-07-09, 17:10 | Link #200 |
Sleepy Lurker
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nun'yabiznehz
Age: 38
|
...O_O
The Rosenbauer Panther 6x6 is definitely larger than a 5th gen Chevrolet Camaro. It's almost twice taller, too, which means greater internal volume (a factor behind the reason why the ILM guys preferred a Peterbilt long-nose rather than a cab over) - thus greater height when "unfolded".
__________________
|
|
|