2015-01-18, 15:42 | Link #121 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austria
|
Quote:
I'm fine with keeping a single-gender category for seiyuu, mostly because there are usually only a few standout performances anyway. (They wouldn't stand out if there were more.) But I can also see why people would want to separate the category by gender. Basically, I'm for scrapping the antagonist category, if we unite main and support cast, and I'm neutral on whether we should have one siyuu category per gender. |
|
2015-01-18, 15:47 | Link #122 | |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
Quote:
We will consider it of course.
__________________
|
|
2015-01-18, 16:34 | Link #123 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austria
|
Quote:
|
|
2015-01-18, 16:43 | Link #124 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Amsterdam
|
Quote:
|
|
2015-01-18, 16:45 | Link #125 | |
On a mission
Author
|
Quote:
But yea, tie it to series performance.
__________________
|
|
2015-01-19, 11:27 | Link #131 |
Kana Hanazawa ♥
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: France
Age: 37
|
Shit, I missed the nomination phase again. So much disappointment in the nominees, particularly with best comedy and best OP, where my top picks, Tonari no Seki-kun and Tokyo Ghoul didn't make it (worst part is that I could have actually helped them). And Chisaki instead of Miuna in best female lead, what the hell? Incidentally, I'm surprised Nagi no Asukara is doing so well. I guess I'm not the only one who really liked that show despite its flaws.
Glad to see Ping Pong doing well. I had no idea whether it was popular over here, I don't recall the thread having a lot of posts. On the other hand, no Gochuumon wa usagi desu ka in slice of life ;_;. Granted, there was a lot of competition this year.
__________________
|
2015-01-19, 16:13 | Link #133 |
He Without a Title
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The land of tempura
|
Thriller sounds nice to me as well. I was going to suggest having SciFi merge into the Fantasy category since that's what the Hugo Awards do but anime in particular has so many shows in those genres that it would become kind of a catch all category in the end so nevermind
__________________
|
2015-01-19, 18:32 | Link #134 | |
AS Oji-kun
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 74
|
For me, if there's ever a decision about which categories to axe, I'd vote for the genre-based ones.
My concern has to do with the "OP/ED" category, especially with it being limited to three nominees. A regular one-cour anime has at least two songs, an OP and and ED, and it might have insert songs as well. A two-cour show often has a second OP and ED. Thus many shows generate four potential competitors, and often as many as half-a-dozen or more. Trying to pick just three nominees from such a profusion of choices is very difficult. If the song category remains as it does now, I'd suggest five as a more reasonable number of nominees. I'd also like to see insert songs be eligible. "Before My Body is Dry" is a hallmark song from 2014, but it's not eligible because it's neither an OP nor an ED. Quote:
__________________
|
|
2015-01-19, 18:46 | Link #135 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
Honestly my gut feeling is telling me all categories should probably just carry over a few more shows to voting; or the requirements to go to voting should maybe be different.
I mean I don't think we ever did any math or observations/tests on what exactly is ideal carry-over. 4 much like the point based voting system is just default we've used since long before we were even the ones organizing it—which means its probably been pulled out of thin air; since the contest was very ad hoc in the early years. Again, I'm not quite 100% sure since running this for years kind of means keeping track of everything a bit problematic. If anyone in the community has any insights on what might be a strong mathematical system on how many should carry over that would help. For the record I personally don't consider replacing one random number with another larger random number to be a "solution" so please don't spam random numbers.
__________________
|
2015-01-19, 19:13 | Link #138 |
sleepyhead
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: event horizon
|
Okey I think I remember now the reasoning for 4. Essentially it has to do with a ad hoc primitive way of ensuring the voting phase votes don't get split too much. Obviously it would actually need to be 2 to actually do that but, well, nobody wants that now do we, so somehow it was 4. Good news: if we switch to instant run-off voting next year for voting (as was originally intended we do for this year; but didn't make the cut) we don't have to worry about that. Instant run-off voting can take 100 entries, people can vote however many they want and it won't matter, the end result is ensured to be either someone getting 50%+1 or (be it very very unlikely) a tie.
tl;dr if we stick with the current voting system for the voting phase, it's bad to have more then 4 (having 4 is already not great statistically), if we switch to instant runoff voting we can have however many you want and the result will still be strong. Adhoc Poll The question now is: Given a list of X series, that you have to pick a subset of Y series from (where Y is any number you want between 0 and X) And that you then have to order those Y series by which you like more (best being first, least being last) At what value of X is that tedious/annoying/notfun? - Personally I would say 11; just because 10 coincides with things like "top 10" that people might have already thought about in other contexts. Thinking past top 10 is a bit too hard, assuming worst case where I like everything then top 10 is where I would draw the line of "easy & fun"
__________________
|
2015-01-19, 22:20 | Link #139 |
Senior Member
Author
|
I strongly disagree with felix on the nominee cutoff issue.
I think much more than 4 would render the nomination process almost entirely pointless, especially for the genre categories. I think that knowing that the solid majority of nominees don't make the cut inspires people to take part in the nomination process, and can even motivate people to get any friends with similar anime likes/tastes to take part (the latter I definitely don't see happening with a freaking 10 nominees per category getting through). I also think that 4 (or 5 at most) is a nice number to pick from, and that much more than that would make voting extra cumbersome, having much the same effect as having an overabundance of total award categories. Personally, I think we should just stick to 4, even if we do go to runoff voting next year. 4 seems to work perfectly well, in my opinion.
__________________
|
Tags |
choice awards |
|
|