2008-08-16, 04:45 | Link #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=136847&page=3 Quote:
i doubt a gt280 could change that, also badaboom doesnt support sli nor multigpu on same card (yet?) im kinda positive they will get faster soon, as bada is still beta (0.9) , however, the quality will still suck compared to x264 cause the mainline profile simply limits too much! =( i also dont quite understand why gpus suck so much for h264. newest radeon has 2.0 TFLOPS of power... Intel plans its newest nehalem 8core with a speed of like ~230Glops total in the year 2012 for facks sake ! Yeah sure, encoding doesnt need floats, x264 works on 16bit math afaik, but newest gpus support 32/64int just fine so wtf... we can get to like ~8Tlops already lol ... edit : badaboom failed to shine : http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3374&p=7 Last edited by M.D. Geist; 2008-08-18 at 16:48. |
||
2008-08-22, 21:25 | Link #22 | |
the hedgehog
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
|
Quote:
so i use MPC-HC's internal H.264 DXVA capable decoder to offload decoding from the CPU to videocard. it's also freeware. too bad the list of supported videocards is so short. somebody from MPC-HC development thread said he is going to make a simple tutorial what's good about MPC-HC internal DXVA decoder is that it will first check if the file is DXVA compliant encoded, and if not it will fall back to software decoding so you wont get playback problems. just tried badaboom. got around 7 fps while encoding a Blu-Ray sample to 1080p and highest quality on my 8600GTS. not much ...
__________________
Last edited by gugumomu; 2008-08-22 at 21:53. |
|
|
|