2010-12-28, 21:15 | Link #2482 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Kanon wasn't burning Shannon's image into his eyes, he was burning Hideyoshi's. Either way, it's solvable. |
|
2010-12-28, 21:18 | Link #2483 | ||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The fake death scenario from game 5 is to make Natushi confess, but Krauss wouldn't go along with that. The fake death scenario from game 6 appears to be set up by the family to question Genji, but Genji is the one dead here. Quote:
|
||
2010-12-28, 21:24 | Link #2484 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Money they were planning to wring out of Krauss. But since someone else actually has the money and is willing to hand it over then and there in exchange for a couple of days of acting, well, why not? The fake death scenario is certainly set up to implicate Natsuhi, sure. But Natsuhi isnt the culprit. So the question is why would the dead go along with the scheme? Same reason they go along with it in game 6. |
|
2010-12-28, 21:30 | Link #2485 | ||
The True Culprit
|
Quote:
Quote:
We're continually told that someone is using the phenomena of Beatrice to do the murders without being noticed, so it's entirely logical that someone is doing real murders behind Yasu's show.
__________________
|
||
2010-12-28, 21:34 | Link #2486 | |||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I have a hard time believing they can fake their deaths here, unless the stakes are supposed to be trick weapons. I mean, they're embedded in their foreheads. Also, they are declared "killed" in red. They don't have any convenient tricks for not dying for real like Shkanon. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
2010-12-28, 21:45 | Link #2487 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Lots of money is lots of money. That Yasu offered to pay them off doesn't mean she needed to show the siblings where the Gold was hidden, right? |
|
2010-12-28, 21:54 | Link #2489 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Let's set that aside for a moment:
We know the money exists. We know the gold exists. We know the siblings know that exists. Therefore, all that needs to be proven is that Yasu controls those assets. Not that she has them right there on the island. Therefore, all Yasu needs to do is show them Kinzo's will naming her the heir. Or, if it refers to the one who solves the epitaph, just have the servants corroborate that she did indeed solve it. With the fact she controls the wealth of the family as leverage, that's enough to get the adults to play along. |
2010-12-28, 21:55 | Link #2490 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Why are you being so defensive? If you think so hard about answering the answers you're just gonna get a headache.
reread episode 2 or something and come up with your own answer okay? Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 22:05 | Link #2491 | ||||
The True Culprit
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||||
2010-12-28, 22:17 | Link #2492 | ||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
"Both killed by another person" according to the fiction, they're actually just fine. "Only one chapel key exists" according to the story. There are actually 17, and we use them all behind your back. The red only tells the truth about fiction, is it? Very disappointing if true. I still don't see how they can fake deaths with a stake embedded in their skull. No murders at all? Must make it pretty easy for Battler to get a happy ending. |
||
2010-12-28, 22:24 | Link #2493 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
That being said, of course its referring to fiction, the Rokkenjimma Serial Murders didnt occur in real life. |
|
2010-12-28, 22:30 | Link #2495 | |
Just... disturbed.
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-12-28, 22:33 | Link #2496 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Or it's a collapsible stake, which doesn't make sense with how short the handle is but whatever. They don't point that out in the VN. Really theories about fake stakes for fake deaths have been around forever.
__________________
|
2010-12-28, 22:34 | Link #2497 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
They could have been borrowed from Gainax or something. |
|
2010-12-28, 22:39 | Link #2498 |
Senior Member
|
I'm not suggesting the reds don't go along with the context from how they are said, or what game they go with. Where did you get that idea?
I take issue with the following interpretation: Both were killed by another person in the story that everybody is trying to make the kids believe, but they're really perfectly fine. Some stakes are pulled out of people though. There really isn't anything to suggest the stakes have been modified. I think Battler even examines one at one point. |
2010-12-28, 22:50 | Link #2499 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-12-28, 22:50 | Link #2500 | ||
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|