|
View Poll Results: Toradora! - Episode 23 Rating | |||
Perfect 10 | 86 | 50.89% | |
9 out of 10 : Excellent | 52 | 30.77% | |
8 out of 10 : Very Good | 16 | 9.47% | |
7 out of 10 : Good | 8 | 4.73% | |
6 out of 10 : Average | 3 | 1.78% | |
5 out of 10 : Below Average | 1 | 0.59% | |
4 out of 10 : Poor | 0 | 0% | |
3 out of 10 : Bad | 0 | 0% | |
2 out of 10 : Very Bad | 0 | 0% | |
1 out of 10 : Painful | 3 | 1.78% | |
Voters: 169. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
2009-03-12, 14:12 | Link #83 | ||||
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
Great defense there bro, great defense. Tell me, were you in your high school's debating club? Because you're so talented at coming up with rebuttals, you must have been. I suppose YOU have the knowledge to tell people what to think? Quote:
Okay, I have to at least say SOMETHING... See, a successful and sound argument isn't "You're wrong", it's "You're wrong, here's some reasons WHY." That, or sheer sarcasm. Right then. I was wrong. I'd argue that the "romantic" part of "romantic comedy" covers the "drama" bit fairly well. Quote:
Quote:
And I think the creators would know what genre their work fits in. |
||||
2009-03-12, 14:16 | Link #84 | |
進む道は武士道のみ
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dying to get back to Japan (but currently near Chicago)
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Yeah, Minori was kind of dangerously scary this episode. It would match Ryuji's external appearance but it wouldn't go well with his maiden heart. I might be a little worried for whatever ghosts she comes across later on (as the Ryuji pair is all but dead as of late). |
|
2009-03-12, 15:04 | Link #88 | |
進む道は武士道のみ
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dying to get back to Japan (but currently near Chicago)
Age: 36
|
Quote:
|
|
2009-03-12, 15:55 | Link #90 | ||||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
As for the rebuttals - i blame it on the philosophy. I am master of philosophy after all, so I guess it comes from there. Quote:
Personally, I do not think I know to tell what the truth is, I just know that someones signle opinion is never right, and thats what you are trying to throw at - your own personal view as if a truth, which is fine as long as you don't start poking it under others' noses, as if forcing it to others, which i feel you do. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When you take such series and compare it to series which are clearly a seinen/shounen you can see the difference. Quote:
|
||||||
2009-03-12, 16:06 | Link #91 |
緩和
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
gg... what is the purpose of getting all philosophical over the stories category? I didn't know the genre in which the stories creator labeled herself was made to be "perceptible by ones opinion."
Writer: This story in which I am creating will be labeled as a romantic comedy, because thats exactly what I will write it to be. It's my story afterall. Reader: It's YOUR story but I don't want to classify it as a romantic comedy for MY own personal reasons, sorry. I suppose that makes sense. >_> |
2009-03-12, 16:23 | Link #92 |
Senior Member
|
Well the question is did the author labelled the stories herself or did the editors do that.
Are you really sure she wrote with "I will make a shiounen" on her mind? Did she tell you herself? As far as I know in creative process the tagging tend to be rather lose and then authors suffer from the editors that still need to do the tagging and have a specific genre to match. There are teh requirements but it doesn't mean that author writes following those specific requirements and sometimes have to as russians say 'padagnat' the result a little so taht it would look like it matches the requirements. Don't know if this happened with toradora author though. If you do, and she said so, then my musings are wrong. But so far from those my friends that do writing, it is not as simple as just always having a specific tagging and then matching a writing on it. There is a difference. Not to mention that authors understanding of what romantic comedy is, may be very different from others. Like lets say author identifies book as comedy, but the tag is still rather vague and you may feel that it was actually tragedy. Like our authors book about his experience in Nazi's concentration camp - basically it is comedy but the things they talk about are barely comical. Not exactly tragicomedy either... In same cases tags leave it tio be very vague and not really telling of what the thing is about. Sometimes work really matches the tag, but Toradora is something different that is hard to place into tags just like that, even if you are forced to do, to present it to the market, it doesn't mean that those tags do any good to your work, if it is a good work. |
2009-03-12, 16:24 | Link #93 | |||
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
I don't want to become a writer if I'm going to have jackasses like that reading my works. Quote:
I just can't. I can't deal with this anymore. I'm going to crawl into a corner and cry if this keeps up. I just can't do this anymore. Quote:
|
|||
2009-03-12, 16:33 | Link #94 | ||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Or is it something else you don't like? Quote:
|
||
2009-03-12, 16:39 | Link #96 |
Senior Member
|
There is difference. Because one way you are really paying attention to the tag and tag really gives out the information, in other case tag becomes just a 'must' product simply because the author has to classify the work, even if that chosen rag is vague compared to the content.
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|