2006-02-04, 14:41 | Link #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 38
|
moderation
Yeah I'm just commenting on the fact that this forum's moderation is pretty heavyhanded. Is it really necessary to always slap threads together just because they have similar topics? I could understand it if they were only a couple weeks or so apart, but two years? That's a bit extreme imo... and it makes things confusing.
|
2006-02-04, 15:31 | Link #2 | |
Monarch Programmer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Liverpool
Age: 42
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2006-02-04, 16:08 | Link #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 38
|
What's wrong with bringing up something like this in the Forum & Site Feedback section? Is that not what it's for?
At least two of the threads I've started have been put into other threads... and I've seen this done multiple times to other threads. This is the only forum I've seen do this. The last one I made was put into a thread from 2003... |
2006-02-04, 16:32 | Link #4 | |
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
You might think it's heavy handed, but I used to lurk on a forum where someone was banned for ten days just because he didn't share a mod's view on a subject. When other members complained, that thread was locked. I've also seen forums with very lose moderation, which become chaotic pretty quickly. I would say AS has a fair moderation policy.
__________________
|
|
2006-02-04, 19:15 | Link #5 | |
Just call me Ojisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: U.K. Hampshire
|
Quote:
Having multiple threads means the same questions are asked over and over and that any discussion might lose focus, so no matter how old a thread is a new one will be merged with an old one. As for a 2 year gap, well it's possible but it was more likely due to the recent forum restore where we lost almost a complete year of posts (take a look at the top of the forum, we have this link Not visited the forum in a while? Please Read This First!). So sorry, this policy of merging threads is likely to remain. We know that it might seem a bit odd at times but we think the positives outweigh the negatives. |
|
2006-02-04, 19:22 | Link #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 38
|
Okay, oh well.
And actually, I did search "Love Hina" before making the thread and no thread by that name came up. So I was a bit confused when a thread started in 2003 was merged with mine. Last edited by jedinat; 2006-02-04 at 19:40. |
2006-02-04, 19:45 | Link #7 | |
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Netherlands
Age: 45
|
I just tried -- I didn't really have much trouble finding the Love Hina thread. In cases
like this it's easier to use the "Advanced Search" feature btw, so that you can search on thread titles only, which is likely to find the thread you're looking for more quickly. Quote:
took place during 2005 and we always merge discussions about one single series into one thread. So this is why it's possible for discussions about older series to get merged with seemingly "ancient" threads. |
|
2006-02-04, 20:01 | Link #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
|
@ jedinat
Simple solution: don't create topics. I came to the same conclusion long ago, since topic-creators stick to the eye of the moderators and thus risk you being banned. Do you want to get banned? No, so you don't create topics either. |
2006-02-04, 20:48 | Link #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 38
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-02-04, 20:55 | Link #10 | ||
~chibi tenshi~
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris, France ~♪
Age: 42
|
Quote:
Even without the Advanced Search, I get two Love Hina threads on the first page's results Here's what I did: then I got this: Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Hellychan; 2006-02-04 at 21:33. |
||
2006-02-04, 21:00 | Link #11 | |
Aria Company
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2006-02-04, 22:58 | Link #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 38
|
Quote:
We may never know. |
|
2006-02-04, 23:01 | Link #14 | |
DIGITAL RULER @_@
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: somewhere close you dont know of
|
Quote:
let me answer that ...no no in some small cases now the world will never know how many licks till you get to the center of a tottsie pop |
|
2006-02-04, 23:09 | Link #16 | |
DIGITAL RULER @_@
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: somewhere close you dont know of
|
Quote:
LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!11!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! >.> let me test your theory *lick* 1 *lick* 2 *lick* 3 *crunch* 4..it takes four and i am correct for we are the mooninties we are supperior because we live on the moon....and for I am the Digital ruler ...it is science |
|
2006-02-04, 23:12 | Link #18 | |
DIGITAL RULER @_@
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: somewhere close you dont know of
|
Quote:
i simpaly ment why should anyone care...i did not mean to attack |
|
|
|