2006-09-13, 00:57 | Link #23 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
1) Simple in design to ease production and maintenance. 2) No huge backpacks with wings, oversized cannons, etc that affects balance, storage, getting up after falling on the back, etc. 3) As small as possible all aspect profile. 4) Many more. |
|
2006-09-13, 03:56 | Link #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
|
I read on ign or gamespy (can't remember which one) that the 360 will get its own version thats different from ps3 , the 360 one is more like EAs battlefield games.
________ Vaporizer Answer Last edited by OMG_Zerg_Rush; 2011-03-21 at 14:44. |
2006-09-13, 12:03 | Link #26 |
Gundam Boobs and Boom FTW
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Katana misconception? Katanas DO work better than other swords!
Though I'm not sure about the JSFs...stealth is pretty much silly when terrorists have no radars anyway! >.< The F22 right now is an anachronism, I feel...its prey (Cold War Russian fighter jets) no longer exist in that state, and even the amazing Su-37 super flanker, Su-47 (Forward swept wing version) and Mig 1.44 (sleek n' shiny eurofighter with far more power) simply do not have the funds to compete with the F-22.
__________________
|
2006-09-13, 13:20 | Link #27 | ||
Catholic = Cat addiction?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MURICA!!
|
Quote:
Katana DO NOT work better than every other sword, that is a myth propelled by D&D fanatics and blind worshippers of so-called Asian mystics. Every other sword, including the Katana, were constructed for specific purposes. For example, German zweihanders were designed as line-breakers, especially against massive pike formation employed by the Swiss during the Renaissance. Katana, being constructed mainly as a slicing weapon, would have done very little against soldiers with heavier armor. Moreover, even traditional Japanese armours proved to be very resistant against katana cuts. Facts: 1. The katana we know today is in fact a post 1500 product. An artifact dictated by the ruling Tokugawa family in its length, width and cnostruction. Swords during the Japanese warring states were shown to be quite different. 2. Bows and lances were usually the tools that produced the first casualties, not swords. Additionally, prior to the 19th century, Japan had not won a single war outside of its own territory. Every Japanese attempt at invading the Asian mainland were often thwarted by the Chinese completely to the point of embrassment. Needless to say, the 'katana' weren't exacty life-savers. Quote:
But, give it a little time, and soon Chinese jets will be squaring off against American ones, manned or otherwise. - Tak (And anything else regarding this subject-matter at this time, I feel, is more appropriately discussed in private msgs) |
||
2006-09-14, 08:00 | Link #28 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
|
http://www.xboxyde.com/news_3459_en.html#forum
I prefer the look of the Xbox 360 Gundam game. In that you can also exit the gundam and do some shooting as a regular grunt which I think isn't possible in the PS3 version. |
2006-09-14, 19:57 | Link #30 |
I hear voices
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 37
|
hmm didn't see this thread, probably could of posted my question in here, instead of making a new thread, my bad.
But yea, although the PS3 version looks alright, well not in those pics, but im sure come release it will look good. It just looks like the same style of gundam games we got for the PS2. The 360 version seems to be trying something new, and the battlefield idea with mechs and other vechiles included, seems to fit well. Should get more info though, come TGS |
2006-09-15, 06:07 | Link #31 | |
I can see time itself!
|
Quote:
And the Turn A is awesome. Moustache, Gundam hammer and nuclear missiles? I'm game. And I actually think that Epyon looks way, way, WAY worse than the Zeong, which just needs a small head redesign, but at least it has some funky 70's charm. |
|
2006-09-15, 06:26 | Link #32 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
Quote:
If Pimping out/Tuning cars wasn't a markettable thing, do you think it would've gotten a time in our era? Sure it died down pretty quick, but fact is, there are people who are willing to cash out to be flashy one way or another. Gundam is no different. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
2006-09-15, 06:39 | Link #33 | |
I can see time itself!
|
Quote:
Turn A Gundam It can also kick the ass of, well, anything. Last edited by srb; 2006-09-15 at 14:42. |
|
2006-09-15, 21:36 | Link #35 |
I believe I can fly!
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Turn A is one of the best Gundam designs out there. It's simple, sleek, very origional, and looks incredible in motion. It's down to business while looking foreign and unique at the same time. You want flash? MLB FTW.
Yes, there are designs out there that beat it, but it is definetly one of the better designs in the last 10 years(with X, the Astrays, and Stargazer) And by the way, Stargazer is the best looking MS in CE. Period. |
2006-09-16, 02:16 | Link #36 | |
Some say I'm the Reverse
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
(Yes, I know it's not been proven, I just had to mention that) And MooMooFarm--Let's just agree to disagree. I've got nothing against Seed or alternate universe Gundam, I just personally want to see more UC stuff out there aside from model kits.
__________________
|
|
2006-09-17, 01:49 | Link #39 |
Some say I'm the Reverse
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
KCT--the MK-II is done construction but not painting, been really lazy lately and have bought the F91, so...no, I haven't bought a digital camera either. ^_^;;;
I seem to be the only person who likes the Zaku Warrior but loathes the Dom Trooper. Which is ironic, since in UC terms I liked the Doms better than the Zakus. And besides, the Jet Stream Attack just doesn't seem....right...with that flowery pink fairydust protecting it. But I'll admit, the Ginn and GuAiz were pretty good designs.
__________________
|
|
|