2012-06-26, 10:11 | Link #41 | |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
Quote:
1) Not all ISPs are interested in or have the capability/equipment. So far the only ones who have even expressed interest are the ones owned by the media content middlemen (Time-Warner, etc ... I've stopped calling them creators because they aren't - they screw the creators as well). 2) They *can* log file-to-file transmissions but most ISPs dump their logs after a few days at most simply because of the volume. Often a human never even looks at them. DDLs (computer-to-computer whole file transmissions) constitute literally billions of transactions a day in a large ISP. 3) Encrypted packets are opaque. An ISP would have to collect enough of them, run them through a decoding process and then figure out what they had. Most ISPs are not the National Security Agency multiplied by a million to handle all the possible file transactions nor do they have that sort of equipment. 4) ISPs are in business to give you access to the Internet. There's no incentive for them to "go after you". IF law enforcement chose YOU specifically (due to a warrant), they could collect all your ingoing and outgoing traffic but that would amount to an expensive sting operation. In most countries, law enforcement can't simply go on "fishing expeditions". And with the advent of "casual Joe Public streams his tv stuff via Hulu, Netflix, Crunchyroll", everyone has a lot of data transfer. 5) Torrenting is different - its EASY to nab someone because everyone is broadcasting their address in a specific cloud for a specific copyright violation. Animax or Disney hire private 3rd party companies who download a bit torrent client, collect some cloud member IPs, and then issue DMCAs to the ISP to hand to you. For that they charge the Animax's lots of money. The DMCA takedown keeps it out of the court system - where the courts have mostly ruled that an IP address does NOT equal a specific person. 6) As several of our Japanese-who-live-in-Japan posters and our posters who analyze Japanese politics have pointed (repeatedly), a law being passed doesn't mean the Japanese government is "serious about it". There's this concept called "feel good law" -- makes the lobbyist happy without actually accomplishing much.
__________________
|
|
2012-06-26, 17:49 | Link #42 | ||
Giga Drill Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
@Vexx
i am mostly basing my previous answer because of what i read here Quote:
the highlight of that link says Quote:
|
||
2012-06-26, 20:44 | Link #43 |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
They can claim whatever they want, but decrypting the content of a winny/share type p2p data packet is far from easy compared to say, a torrent (which is basically fully transparent). Especially if the file is layered in encryption to begin with, on top of the p2p packet encryption.
Yeah, it's possible. No, it's not realistic to analyze every packet. It'll probably be used to make "examples" of random arrests though.
__________________
|
2012-06-26, 20:58 | Link #44 |
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
I thought the unity cache things helped provide plausible deniability. You will end up randomly downloading and uploading a lot of stuff that isn't what you were actually downloading.
As for the ability to catch people using Japanese P2P. All I have seen are initial uploaders, not uploading when its already in the system, and I don't see how downloading is any easier to catch. Also, these are against individual people, not the mass torrent lawsuits in the US. This suggests that they have a very hard time catching people. Also, none of the cases relate to late night anime, which suggests the late night anime industry doesn't really care (a study specific to anime has shown that piracy boosts anime sales), and the law requires the companies to specifically request antipiracy services before they are provided. |
2012-06-26, 21:29 | Link #46 |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
It's not. It's actually really hard for those encrypted p2p software. That's why they've been going after the relatively easier targets, you know, the morons who BRAG about their uploads on IP-saving forums. Yeah, those guys.
__________________
|
2012-06-26, 22:00 | Link #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Anonymous Declares War on Japan Over Illegal Downloads:
"Hacker collective Anonymous has declared open season on the Japanese government for its passage of a draconian ban on illegal downloads and ripping, briefly taking down several government websites in a series of cyber-attacks." See: http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2012/0...gal-downloads/ |
2012-06-26, 22:23 | Link #48 | |
今宵の虎徹は血に飢えている
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
Well the biggest protection is still international borders
__________________
|
|
2012-06-26, 22:27 | Link #49 | |
Giga Drill Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
and yes they cannot monitor or stop all uploading but the unlucky few that will be caught will serve as a scare for other uploaders ye exactly they will just target few people that will serve as an example and be publicized later to show and make other uploaders to be afraid and stop uploading already |
|
2012-06-26, 22:28 | Link #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tennessee
Age: 36
|
In recent years Anonymous has started to become my hero, honestly. I know that most of these sky-is-falling scary new laws of the month aren't as bad as they're initially painted (Kudos to Vexx for always informing us that things honestly aren't that bad, I do always get a bit nervous when it comes to threads like these), but I still appreciate Anonymous fighting the good fight. So long as they're on the job, the government can't just casually attempt to tighten internet policies without worrying about repercussions.
|
2012-06-26, 22:33 | Link #51 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
My aggravation is that all these ridiculously cancerous "anti-piracy" laws do is:
1) erode the proper meaning of copyright, patent, and trademark laws. 2) magnify disrespect for law in general. 3) corrupt politicians who get handouts from the cartels. They're lobbied for by technological illiterate luddites, written by the incompetent, and passed by the clueless. Then courts have to clean up the mess (e.g. "no, sorry an Internet Address does NOT equal a person", etc.)
__________________
Last edited by Vexx; 2012-06-29 at 10:52. |
2012-06-26, 23:26 | Link #52 | |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
Quote:
But afaik, all the arrests have been through easily trackable IP traces of forums, instead of actual "lol p2p got haxxxed". Our police aren't very competent. And that's actually an understatement.
__________________
|
|
2012-06-27, 07:06 | Link #53 |
AS Oji-kun
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 74
|
Don't Japanese P2P implementations also require a common tracker where file sharers register their IPs like BitTorrent uses? Or do peers using something like DHT or some other distributed system to announce their existence? Exchanging a torrrent on BT is the equivalent of announcing that you're a pirate since your IP address is right out there for everyone to see and associated with the copyrighted work you're infringing.
__________________
|
2012-06-27, 16:22 | Link #55 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
With the wide-ranging anti-piracy laws they have now, I suppose it's conceivable that someone could argue just being on one of these networks could be probable cause for a search since "you're probably doing something illegal". But by the same token, I understand that most of the laws are actually acted upon based on complaints by the rightsholder whose work is infringed (which is really hard to determine based on the above system), so that's why they probably rely more on the infinite human potential to blow their own cover.
__________________
|
|
2012-06-28, 22:22 | Link #57 |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
OH LORDY.
Anonymous mistakenly attacked a local office in Kasumi-gaura, an office out in nowhereland, near a lake in Ibaragi, instead of the their target... government building in Kasumi-gaseki, Tokyo. They took down their site and cracked the server. NICE JOB, now the lake goers and locals have to deal with traffic problems due to server maintenence. Basically it's like if a hacker group accidently cracked into traffic maintenance office somewhere out in East Texas while trying to crack NASA. Anonynous response was "oops sorry, Japanese is damn hard" .............
__________________
Last edited by aohige; 2012-06-28 at 22:36. |
2012-06-28, 22:38 | Link #59 |
( ಠ_ಠ)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere, between the sacred silence and sleep
|
I have bad news for them, there's another Kasumi-gaseki in Saitama, as well as many other places in Japan with similar names.
Kasumi-gaoka, Kasumi-gashiro, Kasumi-gatani, Kasumi-gataki, Kasumi-gamine, Kasumi-gaputwhateverthehellyouwant.
__________________
|
|
|