2010-09-19, 13:23 | Link #12903 | |
Labda Prakarsa Nirwikara
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pekanbaru (UTC+07:00)
Age: 37
|
Quote:
Y'know what? I think I'll just buy the "threat level" theory, that's what Tsuzuki probably intended anyway. "Meh, those guys are C-ranks, they're Cannon Fodders." "Oooh, that girl is A-rank, be very careful!". Something like that... Hmm, maybe this is how they categorize them: SS- Superweapon Spammer! A- Almost Awesome B- Better than nothing, I guess C- Cannon Fodder D- Designated Victims
__________________
Last edited by Tiresias; 2010-09-19 at 13:54. |
|
2010-09-19, 14:42 | Link #12906 | ||
Mastermind Rational
Author
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2010-09-19, 14:56 | Link #12907 |
Banned
|
Most of this is speculation. All we know for sure is that mage ranks are tested. Apparently, you can observe and guess that someone like Fate seems to output at AAA levels, but it's just a rough estimate. Given that she went up to S+, it meant that the AAA estimate was a bit off. And of course, it's likely both Nanoha and Fate could have gone higher, but they stopped taking tests (Nanoha stopped due to her injury, and Fate stopped along with her).
So mage ranks are mainly test only. Magic point values are things you can measure, apparently, but that's different than a rank. And of course, spell ranks are different and are more accurate given that assign specific value ranges to speed, control, and power. |
2010-09-19, 15:04 | Link #12908 | |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Really, there's no visible difference between measurements and test ranks. Again, Fate was measured at AAA. Then she did a test, and what was she awarded? AAA rank. Only now it had the 'official' stamp. Which is really the only difference we know off. The stamp. |
|
2010-09-19, 16:02 | Link #12909 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
There is a very good reason for this, as Chrono pointed out: rank really doesn't mean much compared to skill. So there's no real reason to apply any kind of ranking system to computer measurements. Instead, ranks are just like certificates. You apply for them, and if you pass, you are granted the license. In short, applying ranks based on measurement is pointless. |
|
2010-09-19, 16:18 | Link #12910 | |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Also, Chrono never said 'rank really doesn't mean much compared to skill' he said that power doesn't mean everything. Which is a rather different thing entirely. And he was referring to a completely different measurement too, so his quote is rather irrelevant in this case. You might say there's no real reason to apply any kind of ranking system to computer measurements, but clearly the TSAB thinks differently, since they use ranks for darn near everything. Power, speed, range, casting time, difficulty, everything. It really is just a powerlevel system no matter how you look at it. Why make it more complicated then it needs to be? Last edited by Keroko; 2010-09-19 at 16:40. |
|
2010-09-19, 16:42 | Link #12911 | ||
Banned
|
Quote:
Quote:
But trying to apply a single rank to a mage taking into account all factors, doesn't do the mage justice. There is too many variables. In that case, it makes more sense for rank to just be the certificate of a test that the mage passes. Another way to phrase what they said on the Arthra which makes everything line up nicely, is that Nanoha and Fate "look like they have the level of a AAA-rank mage." This keeps rank as test-only, but allows some room to estimate based on multiple measurements and visual observation. And it keeps in line with logical reasoning that it's fairly pointless to apply a single letter to a mage as a system of measurement; to do so doesn't really tell you much. It's like saying a football player is B-class. What does that even mean? Football players have many varying skills and attributes, that even if you measured how fast they ran, how far they threw or kicked a ball, you can't fit that all into a single letter, so it's practically useless as a measurement. A single letter doesn't tell you much; only gives a vague idea of power, so it's a bad way to measure something. To do so would make the TSAB look rather stupid, which I suppose is one valid view. I guess I just prefer taking the explanation that doesn't make them look rather stupid. |
||
2010-09-19, 16:51 | Link #12912 | ||
Friendly Satanist
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
It bugs me that the A's Nano fancomic is labelled as an official part of the manga >_> Quote:
Oh, and has anyone read ch10 of the Movie manga? I'm really not sure what to make of it anymore... Last edited by CrowKenobi; 2010-09-19 at 17:58. Reason: Don't link to scan sites... |
||
2010-09-19, 17:02 | Link #12913 | ||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
So Nanoha and Fate didn't pass the S rank test until they already served in the bureau for at least a two years, three in Fate's case. The bureau tested Fate prior to her even joining the bureau (A's manga). Conclusion? Nanoha and Fate were AAA ranked, and grew in power over the years. Source. Quote:
It's a simple powerlevel system! You know, "Oh crap! That guy is S-rank! Run for it!" Stuff like that. A simple way for the viewer to see that character A is packing dynamite. Yeesh, must everything result in a 'this makes the TSAB look stupid' debate these days? Last edited by Keroko; 2010-09-19 at 17:18. |
||
2010-09-19, 17:45 | Link #12914 | |||
Banned
|
Quote:
And in all the years past that (6 years between then and StrikerS), they didn't get any stronger? At all? If they did, then the cast might refer to them as having the power of an SS-rank or more. They don't. They are referred to by the rank of the test they passed, not by their actual power level, just like everyone else. So rank is test only. That was the whole big reason for episode 1 of StrikerS; no one said Teana and Subaru were B rank before the test. Yet, if they could measure people like you believe and determine a rank like that, there would be no real need for a rank test at all. Quote:
Let's take Bob. Bob is a mage. I tell you that Bob is A rank. What does that tell you about Bob? Answer: Not much. You can only guess at a vague power level. As we've noted, if a AA ranked granny can take down two AAA (or S) ranked mages at once, then ranking really doesn't mean much. It's a piss poor system for measuring a mages power. Thus, the only logical explanation for the TSAB using it, is how they've already described it to us: Just a general way mages can prove how strong and capable they are by passing tests. Sorta like how I have an MSCE certificate above my desk. My actual skill with Microsoft systems can differ quite a bit with someone else who has the same certificate, and they might be able to run loops around me; but we have the certificate just as a ranking system to show others what we are capable of. That's all the rank system is, and thus pointless to use as a direct measurement. Quote:
And perhaps "stupid" is a bad way to phrase it; more like logically reasoning out the best explanation for why the TSAB does something, or handles things a certain way. I can't imagine them using rank as a direct measurement, because it's too simplistic and vague. They can take readings like magic point values, actual output that they can physically measure, and perhaps estimate how high of a rank someone might go based on those measurements; but it doesn't make sense to use rank a direct estimate when we've seen lower ranked people take down higher ranked people. |
|||
2010-09-19, 18:03 | Link #12915 | ||||||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's a simple thing, really. Ranks work like how ranks work. The higher the better, but just like with any power, if you don't know how to use it someone who does has the edge. That doesn't mean the power itself is worthless though, nor the ranking of it. Quote:
Mage ranks in Nanohaverse are simply used as power levels. That's how the system works. Some people find ways around it, but that's the usual genius fighter thing. David versus Goliath and all. Last edited by Keroko; 2010-09-19 at 18:24. |
||||||
2010-09-19, 18:28 | Link #12916 | |||||
Banned
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Same thing with Teana and Vice; Vice was B+ and Teana was B(at the time of StrikerS), but Teana supposedly had twice the magic point values. The actual measurement has no bearing on the rank itself. Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, I don't want to drag this out in the manga thread, so this will be my last post on this subject for now (may comment again if this subject comes up again sometime int he future, heh). So if you want to respond to this and have the last word, feel free.^^ So, to sum up, I'll just restate my point that, based on the difference between magical point value readings which come from an actual computer measurement, and the rank estimate, I have to conclude that mage ranks are test only. You can use them to estimate someone's overall capability based on actual measurements like magic point values, but mage ranks are just a generalization and earned from tests, like certifications. And I'll restate that I'm only referring to mage ranks, which I see as different from spell ranks (a whole 'nother subject, heh). |
|||||
2010-09-19, 18:35 | Link #12917 |
One PUNCH!
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Okay, enough is enough!
Starting from this post, ANY link to a scan site will result in the post being DELETED and the poster being BANNED! Rule 1.1 specifically forbids it and it will be enforced. ...and isn't the StrikerS manga licensed? |
Tags |
adventure, manga, nanoha, seinen |
|
|