2009-06-13, 10:07 | Link #81 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
Not that I'm saying we should be cheering for this by any means, but this borders on fear-mongering with the way it overstates the situation. It's a blog post that uses a factual situation to express the blog poster's fears -- not to be confused with the actual news. |
|
2009-06-13, 19:32 | Link #83 |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Well, I should also say that, in the meantime, it's become clearer that it may be Norn themselves who are making a big fuss about this. We'll see what comes out in the wash. As I've basically said in the comments, I have trouble believing this claim. It just doesn't add up. The poster speculates that it might have something to do with restricting loli content, but that makes no sense whatsoever. There must be more to the story.
In the end, it bares mentioning again that this whole thing from the get-go is just talking about retail stores, so the net effect of all this could just be to push the market towards online distribution. That could result in a major change in the industry, but I'm not convinced it's the end of the world as we know it. I mean, in some parts of the world, it would be unthinkable to sell adult goods in stores where "normal" video games are sold. Obviously, it's going to be a big deal to companies during the awkward transition, but the main thing the industry needs to do to survive a storm like this is to lie low for a little while until things blow over. When you have big-name games like Lump of Sugar's Tayutama becoming major mixed-media franchises where the lead character is obviously non-human (and even selling and heavily advertising a ero-fandisk being released to coincide), I don't think it's all that easy for them to put the genie back in the bottle now and be like "well, actually, that's vile and despicable, and you can't sell that in stores anymore". Keep in mind the CSA and EOCS are industry groups that represent the game makers at retail; they're not governmental organizations. I just can't see it; there's got to be something else at play. |
2009-06-14, 08:45 | Link #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Yeah what Relentless said at the end, I've noticed that these organizations are nothing legal nor official and don't in any sense have the right to punish or ban certain software, its just supposedly ethical to follow if you choose to.
This is where I feel puzzled by the situation, why don't companies just release the content anyway and ignore all those critiques etc I mean its not like the content they were making in the first place is respectable. Regardless of what happens in the media those who are interested in this stuff will buy it and thats all there is to it. |
2009-06-14, 09:08 | Link #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
I think people that are being reassured by the fact they aren't "legal" are ignoring "soft" power. Breaking out would probably feel like a worker breaking out of a Worker's Union in a heavily unionized trade. It is legal and there's nothing they can do to stop him legally, but there's plenty they can do otherwise.
|
2009-06-15, 06:17 | Link #86 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Quote:
lol@ banning nekomimi hmmm i wonder what's gonna happen to other titles like Shuffle... (yep... the shuffle girls with elf ears) |
|
2009-06-15, 09:09 | Link #87 | |
Bishoujo Game Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 38
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-06-15, 10:35 | Link #88 | |
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
It's just new games. |
|
2009-06-15, 10:53 | Link #89 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
That being said, it's in the store's best interests to not drive away too many sales as well, and they're apparently the ones (in response to the special interest group complaints and threat of government regulation) pushing the self-regulatory groups to impose stricter guidelines. This is why I just can't imagine them "regulating out" content from the major brands (Leaf, Key, Type-Moon, Circus, etc.). If the goal here is to sort of white-wash the market and get rid of the most "prurient" stuff, then we'll see the final regulations (once things settle down) be more precise and clearly-worded. Right now, it seems like it's just "panic mode" until they can figure out what to do. |
|
2009-06-15, 17:49 | Link #90 |
A Priori Impossibility
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Age: 33
|
I think we should consider the retailers too: there's always the possibility that some retailers are being cautious about what they sell until the whole censorship and banning business is over with. Considering you can find porn with pregnant women (Really, how can they target fictional media when stuff like this exists?), there's just something incredibly ridiculous (in a stupid way) about the whole situation that more resembles mass hysteria/over-exaggeration more than anything.
|
2009-06-16, 21:50 | Link #94 | |
Clockwork
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Yes thank god for Equality now for saving me from myself otherwise I just might have turned into a loli-raping deviant...
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2009-06-17, 01:15 | Link #96 |
At the end of this world
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hungary, Europe
Age: 39
|
I'm so looking forward to see Rance as a gentleman and a noble, considerate protector of all female-kind.
"My dear Lady! Would you disagree with me, if we both could utilize my Hyper weapon and have a consensual sexual encounter, where my honest, utmost desire would be to personally please you to the edge of sexual satisfaction, without any selfish ulterior motive for myself?" Anyway, how credible is that thing? http://www.new-akiba.com/archives/20...ost_18857.html (NSFW) As far as I understand it claims that panty-shots, impregnation (? I'm not sure) and sex in school (and school uniforms?) might also receive some kinda limitation.
__________________
Last edited by izmosmolnar; 2009-06-17 at 07:03. Reason: punctuation |
2009-06-17, 02:05 | Link #97 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
To be fair, if they are ever going to get serious on "anti <18" sex, uniforms just have to go. I like them very much myself, but let's face it, the whole "college" and "uniform" just makes a hash of the intent of the anti <18 policies and regulations more than any other genre. They can't say they are going to be anti-loli and continue to put a blind eye to this.
Not that I agree with it - I think that there shouldn't be limits on anime/game porn: they don't even involve real human actors, so the bit about harm to living humans during production is ruled out. Just pointing out they are at least being consistent. |
2009-06-17, 04:16 | Link #98 | |
Homo Ludens
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 34
|
Quote:
...It's not like you need porn to tell a good story, guys. Just saying. |
|
2009-06-17, 13:14 | Link #99 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
A sankaku report on the sudden ban on "non-human heroines" (NSFW site)
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/0...nned-in-eroge/ Well... there went Spice&Wolf... hell, there went almost all of science fiction like Star Trek (Kirk+Rigellianspacecadet, Uhura+Spock, etc). I don't normally curse but ... what the fuck, moonbat loonies rule the world now? Take the Greek/Roman mythology out of the schools... omg, non-humans and humans frolick in those, ya know.... sheesh. I suppose this is a good argument that witchburning moralists don't actually need religion to motivate them. Their irrational compulsion to control the thoughts (and sexual activities) of everyone else is a self-starter.
__________________
|
2009-06-18, 00:56 | Link #100 | |
A Priori Impossibility
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Yeah, like that's going to happen. It's funny how people can easily accept thing they're more intimate with or used to when they can just as easily jump the gun in judging something else to be an evil. |
|
|
|